December 2008 Archives by author
Starting: Mon Dec 1 00:34:30 PST 2008
Ending: Wed Dec 31 19:14:11 PST 2008
Messages: 327
- [EM] Advanced Voting Systems: the Dirty Little Secret
Michael Allan
- [EM] Advanced Voting Systems
Michael Allan
- [EM] Advanced Voting Systems
Michael Allan
- [EM] Advanced Voting Systems
Michael Allan
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Aaron Armitage
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Aaron Armitage
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Aaron Armitage
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Aaron Armitage
- [EM] A new simulation
Peter Barath
- [EM] Auctions
Peter Barath
- [EM] Square Vote: an alternative to the Clarke-tax
Peter Barath
- [EM] Square Vote
Peter Barath
- [EM] Square Vote
Peter Barath
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion definition amended
Chris Benham
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Chris Benham
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion (newly amended version)
Chris Benham
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion
Chris Benham
- [EM] IRV's Squeeze Feature
Chris Benham
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Chris Benham
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion (Kristofer)
Chris Benham
- [EM] "Push-over Invulnerability" criterion
Chris Benham
- [EM] "Comprehensive 3-slot Ratings Winner" suggested 2 criteria
Chris Benham
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD
Chris Benham
- [EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?
Chris Benham
- [EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?
Chris Benham
- [EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?
Chris Benham
- [EM] GMC compliance a mistaken standard? (was "CDTT criterion"...)
Chris Benham
- [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations
Terry Bouricius
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Terry Bouricius
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Terry Bouricius
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Terry Bouricius
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Terry Bouricius
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Terry Bouricius
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Terry Bouricius
- [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"
Terry Bouricius
- [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 54, Issue 4
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 54, Issue 11
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Fwd: RCV in SF
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kathy Dopp
- [EM] MAM website now in Unicode (was: Immunity From Majority Complaints now free of Symbol font (was: Re: Who comes "second" in Ranked Pairs?))
Steve Eppley
- [EM] Single-winner election data from the OpenSTV database
Steve Eppley
- [EM] FairVote on Robert's Rules of Order and IRV
Steve Eppley
- [EM] Fwd: Yee/B.Olson Diagrams (YBD's): the next step
Raph Frank
- [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagrams (YBD's): the next step
Raph Frank
- [EM] Voting space graphs, varying sigma
Raph Frank
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules
James Gilmour
- [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules
James Gilmour
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
James Gilmour
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Fred Gohlke
- [EM] Single-winner election data from the OpenSTV database
Greg
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Greg
- [EM] A new simulation
Jobst Heitzig
- [EM] Favoring a frontrunner
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Favoring a frontrunner
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] FairVote on Robert's Rules of Order and IRV
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] R/G/B/Y
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Dave Ketchum
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Paul Kislanko
- [EM] Vote (today!) for Score Voting at Change.org
Jan Kok
- [EM] Vote (today!) for Score Voting at Change.org
Jan Kok
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Juho Laatu
- [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagram Remarks
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Juho Laatu
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Gervase Lam
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] The path to election reform, was Re:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Auctions
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] A new simulation
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Favoring a frontrunner
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] A new simulation
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] The path to election reform, was Re:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagram Remarks
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] How FairVote IRV propaganda has been very effective.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] FairVote on Robert's Rules of Order and IRV
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] FairVote on Robert's Rules of Order and IRV
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Square Vote
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] FairVote on Robert's Rules of Order and IRV
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Advanced Voting Systems: the Dirty Little Secret
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] FairVote Propaganda: Bucklin Voting.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Some Bucklin Voting history in Cleveland, Ohio.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Bucklin "Momentum" from 1914.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Modeling Voters for Discussion and Simulation
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Advanced Voting Systems: the Dirty Little Secret
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 3
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Advanced Voting Systems
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Advanced Voting Systems
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] The history of preferential voting in the United States
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Vote (today!) for Score Voting at Change.org
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Write-in Candidate Rules
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Vote (today!) for Score Voting at Change.org
Jonathan Lundell
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] another reason to avoid strategic motivations
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] "Unmanipulable Majority" strategy criterion (newly amended version)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] A new simulation
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I Prefer IRV to Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] language/framing quibble
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
- [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagrams (YBD's): the next step
Brian Olson
- [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagrams (YBD's): the next step
Brian Olson
- [EM] Voting space graphs, varying sigma
Brian Olson
- [EM] Modeling Voters for Discussion and Simulation
Brian Olson
- [EM] Vote (today!) for Score Voting at Change.org
Michael Rouse
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Markus Schulze
- [EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Markus Schulze
- [EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?
Markus Schulze
- [EM] GMC compliance a mistaken standard? (was "CDTT criterion"...)
Markus Schulze
- [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"
Markus Schulze
- [EM] The path to election reform, was Re:
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] The path to election reform, was Re:
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 1
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative KD
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 2
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Why I think IRV isn't a serious alternative 3
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?
Kevin Venzke
- [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagrams (YBD's): the next step
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagrams (YBD's): the next step
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 54, Issue 18
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Voting space graphs, varying sigma
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] IRV's Squeeze Feature
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] IRV's Starlike Noncompliance
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagram Remarks
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagram Remarks
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagram Remarks
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Yee/B.Olson Diagram Remarks
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] MELLS (min expected lack of log satisfaction)
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] Vote (today!) for Score Voting at Change.org
fsimmons at pcc.edu
- [EM] MELLS (min expected lack of log satisfaction)
fsimmons at pcc.edu
Last message date:
Wed Dec 31 19:14:11 PST 2008
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:33:58 PDT 2014
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).