[EM] "CDTT criterion" compliance desirable?

Kevin Venzke stepjak at yahoo.fr
Thu Dec 25 11:03:45 PST 2008

Hi Chris,

--- En date de : Jeu 25.12.08, Chris Benham <cbenhamau at yahoo.com.au> a écrit :
> Did, as far as you know, Woodall ever actually propose
> the "CDTT criterion" as something that is
> desirable for
> methods to meet  (instead of just defining the CDTT set)?

One thing is that Woodall thought the CDTT was compatible with LNHarm.

It seems to me that almost every criterion that Woodall discussed is
"desirable for methods to meet."

I think CDTT is one of the better ones actually, since it implies
votes-only minimal defense.



More information about the Election-Methods mailing list