March 2003 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Mar 1 00:23:43 PST 2003
Ending: Mon Mar 31 21:41:02 PST 2003
Messages: 203

• [EM] Saari's Basic Argument   Steve Barney
• [EM] Saari's Basic Argument   Steve Barney
• [EM] MC -1, 0, 1 --- STV hybrid   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: MC -1,0,1 ---- IRV hybrid (slightly ammended)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Aim of unfairness suggests denial of an implicitness problem   Craig Carey
• [EM] 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Craig Carey
• [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Craig Carey
• 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Craig Carey
• [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Craig Carey
• [EM] Re: Blake's Margins Arguments   Craig Carey
• 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Craig Carey
• MMC vs "25%" slippage checkboxes (was Re: [EM] Blake's Margins Arguments   Craig Carey
• [EM] So "preference" means "representation of preference"?   Craig Carey
• [EM] Vermont IRV can elect a fanatical candidate   Craig Carey
• Positive and Negative preferences (was Re: [EM] MC -1, 0, 1 --- STV hybrid   Craig Carey
• Wrong claim that FBC checks a method (Re: [EM] MinMax variant   Craig Carey
• [EM] Inferring a method from an MMC axiom   Craig Carey
• [EM] MinMax (pairwise opposition) and Approval   Craig Carey
• [EM] Inferring a method from an MMC axiom   Craig Carey
• [EM] Inferring a method from an MMC axiom   Craig Carey
• [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation   Craig Carey
• [EM] PR and Second Chambers   Craig Carey
• [EM] Re: Blake's Margins Arguments   Blake Cretney
• [EM] 03/01/03 - Another error in Craig's argument:   Donald Davison
• [EM] PR and Second Chambers. Australian example   Anthony Duff
• [EM] MinMax variant   Steve Eppley
• Comment re: Ranked Pairs (was Re: [EM] MinMax variant)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation   Steve Eppley
• IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria (was Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD)   Steve Eppley
• Non-monotonicity of Zavist-Tideman (was Re: [EM] re: Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation   Steve Eppley
• IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria (was Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Non-monotonicity example for Zavist-Tideman Ranked Pairs   Steve Eppley
• IIA performance (was Re: [EM] IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] RP vs BeatpathWinner, committee clarification   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Steve Eppley
• [EM] MAM non-deterministic when tied losers make cycle?   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?   James Gilmour
• [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?   James Gilmour
• 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   James Gilmour
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   James Gilmour
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   James Gilmour
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   James Gilmour
• [EM] PR and Second Chambers   James Gilmour
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   James Gilmour
• [EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportional representation   James Gilmour
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   James Gilmour
• [EM] PR and Second Chambers   James Gilmour
• [EM] PR and Second Chambers   James Gilmour
• [EM] PR and Second Chambers   James Gilmour
• [EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportional representation   James Gilmour
• [EM] PR and Second Chambers   James Gilmour
• [EM] PR and Second Chambers. Australian example   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV in action   James Gilmour
• [EM] re: Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD   Eric Gorr
• [EM] RP vs BeatpathWinner, committee clarification   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Who did you say won?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Interesting article-- James Buchanan   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Defining Majority [was: Blake's margins arguments]   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Duverger's Law   Bart Ingles
• 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Dave Ketchum
• 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] MC -1, 0, 1 --- STV hybrid   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Defining Majority [was: Blake's margins arguments]   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV in action   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant   Venzke Kevin
• [EM] Re: MC -1, 0, 1 --- STV hybrid   Venzke Kevin
• Positive and Negative preferences (was Re: [EM] MC -1, 0, 1 --- STV hybrid   Venzke Kevin
• [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant   Venzke Kevin
• [EM] Vermont IRV can elect a fanatical candidate   Jan Kok
• [EM] Elections Scheduling?   Jan Kok
• [EM] election-methods list move   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Electorama discussion board   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Electoral systems experts meeting   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Update on Electorama   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Interesting article-- James Buchanan   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportional represenation   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportional representation   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Debian election results are in   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] IRV in action   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] The "Tennesee example" for Condorcet   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Smith//MinMax   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Your appraisals requested   Tom McIntyre
• [EM] Who did you say won?   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Elections Scheduling?   Narins, Josh
• [EM] errata   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Elections Scheduling?   Narins, Josh
• [EM] Re: Blake's Margins Arguments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus: MMC. Why WV vs Margins matters.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] So "preference" means "representation of preference"?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus re: Steve Eppley   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Markus, RP vs BeatpathWinner   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] RP vs BeatpathWinner, committee clarification   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Blake's margins arguments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Retiring from voting systems   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria (was Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD)   Norman Petry
• [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Electoral systems experts meeting   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] IDEA report of voting turn out   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Elections Scheduling?   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Elections Scheduling?   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportional represenation   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportional representation   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Defining Majority [was: Blake's margins arguments]   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Duverger's Law   Olli Salmi
• [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Markus Schulze
• 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Blake's Margins Arguments   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus: MMC. Why WV vs Margins matters.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] MinMax variant   Markus Schulze
• [EM] MinMax variant   Markus Schulze
• [EM] MinMax variant   Markus Schulze
• [EM] MinMax variant   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus re: Steve Eppley   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Inferring a method from an MMC axiom   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Inferring a method from an MMC axiom   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD   Markus Schulze
• IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria (was Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD)   Markus Schulze
• IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria (was Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD)   Markus Schulze
• IIA performance (was Re: [EM] IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] A strategy free method   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Saari's Basic Argument   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Saari's Basic Argument   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant   Forest Simmons
• [EM] MinMax variant   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Dyadic ballots (was "...encouraging truncation")   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Dyadic ballots (was "...encouraging truncation")   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval/Ranked Pairs hybrid   Forest Simmons
• [EM] MinMax variant   Forest Simmons
• [EM] MinMax variant   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Dyadic ballots (was "...encouraging truncation")   Forest Simmons
• [EM] MinMax variant   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Your opinion on being able to vote no preference?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Your opinion on being able to vote no preference?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] MinMax (pairwise opposition) and Approval   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Strategy-free Condorcet resolution methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] MinMax (pairwise opposition) and Approval   Forest Simmons
• [EM] A strategy free method   Forest Simmons
• [EM] A strategy free method   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?   Alex Small
• [EM] Who did you say won?   Alex Small
• [EM] Condorcet Letter in Salon.com   Alex Small
• [EM] Your opinion on being able to vote no preference?   Alex Small
• [EM] Timely Question on Borda Applications   Alex Small
• [EM] Strategy-free Condorcet resolution methods   Alex Small
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Alex Small
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Alex Small
• [EM] A strategy free method   Alex Small
• [EM] A strategy free method   Alex Small
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Alex Small
• [EM] PR and Second Chambers   Alex Small
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Alex Small
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Alex Small
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   Alex Small
• [EM] Interesting article-- James Buchanan   Sampo Syreeni
• [EM] Who did you say won?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Markus: MMC. Why WV vs Margins matters.   Adam Tarr
• [EM] ok   Diego Tello
• [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Burt L Monroe, "Voice of Reason" electoral method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: MC -1,0,1 ---- IRV hybrid (slightly amended)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MinMax (pairwise opposition) and Approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] FBC (was MinMax)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Dyadic ballots (was "...encouraging truncation")   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Dyadic ballots (was "...encouraging truncation")   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MinMax (pairwise opposition) and Approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Strategy-free Condorcet resolution methods   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] PR and Second Chambers   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] PR and Second Chambers   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] PR and Second Chambers   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Minor update to voting site   ericgorr at cox.net
• [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation   matt matt
• [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation   matt matt
• [EM] MAM non-deterministic when tied losers make cycle?   matt matt
• [EM] A strategy free method   atarr at purdue.edu
• [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots   stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca

Last message date: Mon Mar 31 21:41:02 PST 2003
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:31:01 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...