[EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportional representation
Rob Lanphier
robla at robla.net
Tue Mar 25 21:51:01 PST 2003
James Gilmour wrote:
>I didn't understand your comment about majoritarian rule amongst the elected
>representatives. No matter how you build a consensus on any issue, at the end of
>the day it will require majority support in the Parliament if it is to become
>accepted national policy.
>
I was probably being too glib, but what I meant by this is that there's
a number of decisions (e.g. selection of a prime minister) where the
coalition building is made very difficult by the fact that it's done
using first-past-the-post (FPTP) rather than approval, Condorcet, IRV,
etc. Even things that are seemingly simple up/down votes often involve
a series of amendments and riders. Moving to proportional
representation ensures that there's better representation on issues, but
in current practice relegates those representatives to use FPTP for
everything.
>That will apply no matter whether you have majority
>government of one party or a coalition, or minority government. Of course, you
>can improve the stability of the Parliament (and of the government) by avoiding
>the stupid rule that any successful vote against the government automatically
>means that the government falls.
>
Indeed, that seems pretty awful. Is that what Poland is doing?
Rob
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list