[EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Steve Eppley
seppley at alumni.caltech.edu
Thu Mar 20 15:13:27 PST 2003
On 20 Mar 2003 at 10:02, Forest Simmons wrote:
> Here's another idea for PR that makes use of Borda style ballots:
-snip-
I like PR methods in principle, because like the best single-winner
methods they don't suffer as much from spoiling. But primitive PR
methods tend to distort the public's perception of "popularity" by
equating the number of seats won by a party with its popularity.
Typically, the party that wins the most seats forms controls the
agenda and, in parliamentary systems, also controls the executive
branch. For example, the Nazi party in 1933 won the most seats and
went on to be granted a lot of power, but they won a minority of
seats and were probably the least preferred party of a majority of
the voters.
A party that wins fewer seats could be preferred by a majority over
the party that wins the most seats, and in that sense is more
popular, and should be distinguished as such by the voting system.
So I prefer a PR system such as the following: Each voter ranks the
parties from most preferred to least preferred, then seats are
awarded to each party in proportion to the number of voters that
ranked it topmost, with the following exception: The voters'
rankings would also be tallied by a good single-winner method (such
as MAM), the winning party according to that method would be awarded
enough extra seats to make it the largest party. Also, that party
would be given control over the legislative agenda (assuming the
legislature operates under typical primitive rules like Robert's
Rules of Order that require agenda control, instead of a modern
asynchronous online system that allows each member to propose issues,
propose alternatives, post arguments, and rank the alternatives).
Another advantage of allowing each voter to rank the parties is that
the voters' relative rankings of the viable compromises become known,
and that may be much more important that learning each voter's
favorite party.
-- Steve Eppley
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list