[EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Stephane Rouillon
stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
Sun Mar 23 12:12:01 PST 2003
James Gilmour a écrit :
> No. The largest single defect of single-member districts is that they usually
> deny representation to half of those who vote. At best, they can guarantee
> representation to only half. The second largest defect of single-member districts
> is that they commonly distort the wishes of the voters in terms of overall
> representation. Gerrymandering is a defect of single-member districts, but it
> comes third on my list.
SPPA (French acronym) solves both lattest problems (totally proportional and no
circumscription).
About the first problem, Montreal simulation done during the Convention of electors,
november 10th, showed direct support using four different methods
after rallying when it is used:
FPTP (no rallying) 46%
MMP (no rallying) 38% - but except to quota, proportional
STV (after rallying) 46% - semi-proportional
SPPA (after rallying) 69% - integer optimal proportional
Just read and ask...
http://www.fairvotecanada.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=8&forum=1&4
> James
>
> ----
> Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
steph
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list