January 2009 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Jan 1 22:06:45 PST 2009
Ending: Sat Jan 31 23:06:21 PST 2009
Messages: 373

• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Dave Ketchum
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   James Gilmour
    • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Terry Bouricius
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Paul Kislanko
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   James Gilmour
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   James Gilmour
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Terry Bouricius
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Terry Bouricius
    • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Paul Kislanko
    • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   James Gilmour
    • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections   Juho Laatu
    • [EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections   Raph Frank
      • [EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections   Paul Kislanko
      • [EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections   Raph Frank
      • [EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections   Paul Kislanko
      • [EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   James Gilmour
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Jonathan Lundell
    • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Paul Kislanko
      • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
    • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Jonathan Lundell
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Jonathan Lundell
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Paul Kislanko
    • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] "majority" == "majority approval" ?   Brian Olson
  • [EM] "majority" == "majority approval" ?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Kathy Dopp
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Report on the 2006 Burlington Mayoral election.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Report on the 2006 Burlington Mayoral election.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
    • [EM] Report on the 2006 Burlington Mayoral election.   Brian Olson
    • [EM] Report on the 2006 Burlington Mayoral election.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Report on the 2008 San Francisco RCV elections   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Report on the 2008 San Francisco RCV elections   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Report on the 2006 Burlington Mayoral election.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] The Ultimate Lottery Method!   fsimmons at pcc.edu
  • [EM] The Ultimate Lottery Method!   fsimmons at pcc.edu
    • [EM] The Ultimate Lottery Method!   fsimmons at pcc.edu
      • [EM] The Ultimate Lottery Method!   fsimmons at pcc.edu
      • [EM] The Ultimate Lottery Method!   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   James Gilmour
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Juho Laatu
    • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Kathy Dopp
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Juho Laatu
  • [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
  • [EM] language/framing quibble   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
    • [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
      • [EM] language/framing quibble   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
      • [EM] language/framing quibble   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
      • [EM] language/framing quibble   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
      • [EM] language/framing quibble   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] language/framing quibble   Fred Gohlke
      • [EM] language/framing quibble   Michael Allan
• [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
  • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
    • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent!   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent!   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Time of trouble? Or put a lid on it?   Michael Allan
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] The structuring of power and the composition of norms by communicative assent   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   James Gilmour
• [EM] Does IRV elect "majority winners?"   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Report on the 2006 Burlington Mayoral election.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard? (was "GMC compliance...")   Chris Benham
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard? (was "GMC compliance...")   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard? (was "GMC compliance...")   Chris Benham
    • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
  • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
    • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Jonathan Lundell
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Jonathan Lundell
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Steve Eppley
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Jonathan Lundell
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Jonathan Lundell
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Jonathan Lundell
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Jonathan Lundell
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Woodall's Whacky & Zany Criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• No subject  
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Condorcet - let's move ahead   Dave Ketchum
  • [EM] Condorcet - let's move ahead   Steve Eppley
    • [EM] Condorcet - let's move ahead   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] Condorcet - let's move ahead   Steve Eppley
      • [EM] Condorcet - let's move ahead   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard? (was "GMC compliance...")   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Chris Benham
  • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Kevin Venzke
    • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Paul Kislanko
    • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Paul Kislanko
    • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Kevin Venzke
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Paul Kislanko
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Kevin Venzke
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard? JL   Kevin Venzke
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard? JL   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Paul Kislanko
    • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Paul Kislanko
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard? JL   Kevin Venzke
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Chris Benham
  • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Chris Benham
  • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Fragmented Condorcet doesn't imply DPC   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Vote for SCORE VOTING at change.gov   Jan Kok
  • [EM] Vote for SCORE VOTING at change.gov   Paul Kislanko
  • [EM] Vote for SCORE VOTING at change.gov   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Chris Benham
  • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Kevin Venzke
    • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Chris Benham
      • [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV and Brown vs. Smallwood   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] IRV and Brown vs. Smallwood   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
    • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Condorcet - let's move ahead   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV and Brown vs. Smallwood   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] IRV and Brown vs. Smallwood   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] MN IRV Case - Judge's Memo & Order   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] IRV and Brown vs. Smallwood   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] IRV and Brown vs. Smallwood   Terry Bouricius
    • [EM] IRV and Brown vs. Smallwood   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Schulze ("Approval-Domination prioritised Margins")   Chris Benham
• [EM] Condorcet - let's move ahead   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Condorcet - let's move ahead   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Condorcet - let's move ahead   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet - let's move ahead   Markus Schulze
• [EM] IRV and Brown vs. Smallwood   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] IRV and Brown vs. Smallwood   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] Condorcet - let's move ahead   Markus Schulze
• [EM] IRV and Brown vs. Smallwood   Kathy Dopp
  • [EM] IRV and Brown vs. Smallwood   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Raph Frank
    • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Generalizing "manipulability"   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Simple illustration of center-squeeze effect in runoff voting   Dave Ketchum
  • [EM] Simple illustration of center-squeeze effect in runoff voting   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
    • [EM] Simple illustration of center-squeeze effect in runoff voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Simple illustration of center-squeeze effect in runoff voting   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Simple illustration of center-squeeze effect in runoff voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Simple illustration of center-squeeze effect in runoff voting   Dave Ketchum
    • [EM] Simple illustration of center-squeeze effect in runoff voting   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jobst Heitzig
  • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
    • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Raph Frank
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
    • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jonathan Lundell
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   James Gilmour
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jonathan Lundell
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Bob Richard
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jonathan Lundell
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   James Gilmour
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Jonathan Lundell
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   James Gilmour
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Michael Allan
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   James Gilmour
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Why the concept of "sincere" votes in Range is flawed.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] "Beatpath GMC" compliance a mistaken standard?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Fwd: PRESS Release - IRV case appealed!   Kathy Dopp
  • [EM] Fwd: PRESS Release - IRV case appealed!   Jan Kok
• [EM] Strategies for RRV/RSV and BR for multi-member constituencies   Raph Frank
  • [EM] Strategies for RRV/RSV and BR for multi-member constituencies   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
    • [EM] Strategies for RRV/RSV and BR for multi-member constituencies   Raph Frank
      • [EM] Strategies for RRV/RSV and BR for multi-member constituencies   Juho Laatu
      • [EM] Strategies for RRV/RSV and BR for multi-member constituencies   Raph Frank
• [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kathy Dopp
  • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
    • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Michael Allan
  • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   James Gilmour
    • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kathy Dopp
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kathy Dopp
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] EM Metrics   Paul Kislanko
  • [EM] EM Metrics   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kathy Dopp
  • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Dave Ketchum
    • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Jonathan Lundell
    • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Jonathan Lundell
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Jonathan Lundell
  • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Raph Frank
    • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kathy Dopp
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Raph Frank
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kathy Dopp
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Raph Frank
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Jonathan Lundell
    • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kathy Dopp
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Raph Frank
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Dave Ketchum
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   James Gilmour
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Raph Frank
      • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Jonathan Lundell
    • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Raph Frank
• [EM] Criterion compliance of loser elimination and weighted positional methods   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Criterion compliance of loser elimination and weighted positional methods   Raph Frank
    • [EM] Criterion compliance of loser elimination and weighted positional methods   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
      • [EM] Criterion compliance of loser elimination and weighted positional methods   Raph Frank
• [EM] MN Plaintiffs Case for the Unconstitutionality of IRV/STV   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Kathy Dopp
  • [EM] STV and weighted positional methods   Jonathan Lundell

Last message date: Sat Jan 31 23:06:21 PST 2009
Archived on: Sat Jan 31 23:06:37 PST 2009

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...