[EM] Condorcet - let's move ahead

[Markus Schulze]

Dear Kristofer Munsterhjelm,

you wrote (19 Jan 2009):

> So voters prefer MAM winners to Beatpath winners
> more often than vice versa. What method is the
> best in that respect?

Copeland methods are the best methods in this
respect.

The fact, that the ranked pairs winner usually
pairwise beats the Schulze winner in random
simulations, is a direct consequence of the facts,
that the Schulze winner is usually identical
to the MinMax winner and that the MinMax winner
usually has a very low Copeland score (compared
to the winners of other Condorcet methods).

Markus Schulze