[EM] Report on the 2006 Burlington Mayoral election.

[Brian Olson]

I dumped the data through my implementations and got pretty similar  
results which can be seen here:
http://bolson.org/voting/burlington_vt/

My implementations proceed with different rules which generally allow  
any ranking or ratings to be cast and counted, so will have different  
totals than the official count.

On Jan 5, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:

> Schulze returns C03 > C04 > C02 > C01 > C05 > C06. So does minmax,  
> Borda, Vote For and Against (1, 0, 0..., -1), and Nauru Borda.
> Plurality returns C03 > C04 > C02 > C01 > C06 > C05. So does Hare  
> (IRV) and Carey.
> Antiplurality returns C03 > C02 = C01 > C04 > C05 > C06.
>
> All positional methods are whole.
>
> The Condorcet matrix is
>
>   0  1289   804  1161  2028  3290
> 5165     0  3397  3556  5136  5875
> 6961  5730     0  4763  7027  7351
> 6747  5545  3991     0  6790  7336
> 1869  1318   603   987     0  3094
> 431   311   194   323   510     0
>
> (row beats column), and the WV basis is thus:
>
>   0     0  0     0  2028  3290
> 5165     0  0     0  5136  5875
> 6961  5730  0  4763  7027  7351
> 6747  5545  0     0  6790  7336
>   0     0  0     0     0  3094
>   0     0  0     0     0     0
>
> which means that C03 is the CW.
>
> (If my program has bugs, there will be errors in the above.)