[EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections

Paul Kislanko kislanko at airmail.net
Sun Jan 4 14:30:29 PST 2009

I'm not sure at all what context this is, but it's fairly simple to define a
"closest winner" metric that is completely transparent. 

-----Original Message-----
From: election-methods-bounces at lists.electorama.com
[mailto:election-methods-bounces at lists.electorama.com] On Behalf Of Raph
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 4:00 PM
To: Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Cc: Election Methods Mailing List
Subject: Re: [EM] Feature extraction and criteria for multiwinner elections

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm
<km-elmet at broadpark.no> wrote:
> Using a closest winner metric has a kind of obscuration/concealment
> though.

I see what you are saying.  There would need to be some way to match
voters to candidates so each candidate has a quota of voters.  (ofc
then there is the Hare/Droop quota issue)
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list