[EM] STV and weighted positional methods
Dave Ketchum
davek at clarityconnect.com
Sat Jan 31 10:44:24 PST 2009
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:25:27 -0800 Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2009, at 9:56 PM, Dave Ketchum wrote:
>
>> The war here is over IRV/STV, which Kathy attacks, Terry defends, and
>> I agree that kathy should win.
>
>
> You agree that IRV/STV is unconstitutional? On what grounds, exactly?
I NEVER said such.
IRV/STV name implies basing on IRV.
IRV VERY OFTEN agrees with Condorcet as to winner - which makes sense since
it uses ranked ballots such as Condorcet usually uses.
Trouble is IRV does not promise to always do as good as Condorcet.
--
davek at clarityconnect.com people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
Dave Ketchum 108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY 13827-1708 607-687-5026
Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
If you want peace, work for justice.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list