September 2003 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Sep 1 00:46:02 PDT 2003
Ending: Tue Sep 30 21:13:02 PDT 2003
Messages: 213

• [EM] Re:"Runoff without Elimination", Condorcet efficiency   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re:"Runoff without Elimination", Condorcet efficiency   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re:"Runoff without Elimination", Condorcet efficiency   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re:"Runoff without Elimination", Condorcet efficiency   Chris Benham
• [EM] "Runoff Without Elimination," Condorcet efficiency   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "Runoff Without Elimination," Condorcet efficiency   Forest Simmons
• [EM] (CIRCLE) Cardinal [I] Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination   Donald Davison
• [EM] (CIRCLE) Cardinal [I] Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] (no subject)   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] [Fwd: Re: Participation examples]   Chris Benham
• [EM] another CR/Approval method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] another CR/Approval method   Forest Simmons
• [EM] another CR/Approval method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] another CR/Approval method   Forest Simmons
• [EM] another CR/Approval method   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Approval, IGB, and Participation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Approval, IGB, and Participation   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Approval Voting and Classical Mechanics   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval Voting and Classical Mechanics   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval voting under fire #1 (James)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Approval voting under fire #2 (Mike Ossipoff)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Approval voting under fire #3 (James)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Approval voting under fire #4 (Mike Ossipoff)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Beatpath and SSD, Goldfish   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Beatpath and SSD, Goldfish   Markus Schulze
• [EM] By the People   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Cardinal Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity   Alex Small
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Condorcet completed by limited-rank Condorcet!   Chris Benham
• [EM] Condorcet completed by limited-rank Condorcet!   Forest Simmons
• [EM] CR, MCA; another CR/Approval method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: CR/Approval   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] re: CR/Approval and cutoffs   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] CR/Approval method, RWE   Chris Benham
• [EM] CR/Approval method, RWE   Forest Simmons
• [EM] CR/Approval method, RWE   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] CRCLE ( Resolving Cycles- Margins Doesn't Do Very Well )   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] CRCLE ( Resolving Cycles- Margins Doesn't Do Very Well )   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: CRCLE ( Resolving Cycles- Margins Doesn't Do Very Well )   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: CRCLE ( Resolving Cycles- Margins Doesn't Do Very Well )   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] CRCLE ( Resolving Cycles- Ranked Pairs Doesn't Do Very Well )   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] CRCLE Response to Donald   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] David's letter of September 3   Donald Davison
• [EM] Re: Diana's Proposed method of cycle resolution:   Donald Davison
• [EM] Re: Diana's Proposed method of cycle resolution:   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Diana's Proposed method of cycle resolution:   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Diana's Proposed method of cycle resolution:   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Diana's Proposed method of cycle resolution:   Alex Small
• [EM] Donald's Reply to Robertas' Request for Opinion:   Anthony Duff
• [EM] Dumb question   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Dumb question   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Dumb question   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question   stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
• [EM] Dumb question   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question   stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
• [EM] Dumb question   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question   James Gilmour
• [EM] Dumb question - across parties   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question - Misunderstanding   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question - Misunderstanding   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Dumb question - Misunderstanding   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question - Misunderstanding   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question - Misunderstanding   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] ESBS   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] explanation of next four postings   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Extremism   Alex Small
• [EM] Extremism   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Re: Extremism   Donald Davison
• Fwd: [EM] Participation criterion: a thought   Kislanko at aol.com
• Fwd: [EM] Participation criterion: a thought   Diana Galletly
• Fwd: [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Kislanko at aol.com
• Fwd: [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Eric Gorr
• Fwd: [EM] Re: Diana's Proposed method of cycle resolution:   Kislanko at aol.com
• Fwd: [EM] Re: Participation criterion: a thought   Kislanko at aol.com
• [EM] Gilmour - Parliamentary question for you?   Donald Davison
• [EM] Re: Improved Generalised Bucklin   Chris Benham
• [EM] IRV-Approval, Condorcet-Approval hybrids   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: IRV - Approval, Condorcet-Approval hybrids   Chris Benham
• [EM] IRV-Approval, Condorcet-Approval hybrids   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] IRV-Approval, Condorcet-Approval hybrids   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: IRV - Approval, Condorcet-Approval hybrids   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV - Approval, Condorcet - Approval hybrids   Chris Benham
• [EM] IRV - Approval, Condorcet - Approval hybrids   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: IRV - Approval , Condorcet-Approval hybrids   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: IRV-Approval hybrid   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: IRV-Approval hybrid   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Plurality   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   John B. Hodges
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Plurality   Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Plurality   Joe Mason
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Plurality   Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality   Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality: IRV examples, PR   Anthony Duff
• [EM] IRV vs. Runoff   Steve Barney
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Runoff   Steve Barney
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Runoff   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Runoff   Steve Barney
• [EM] issue space revisited   Forest Simmons
• [EM] James Gilmour and the Dumb Question:   Donald Davison
• [EM] MCA Participation failure example   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy   Alex Small
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought   Kislanko at aol.com
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Re: Participation criterion: a thought   Chris Benham
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Participation criterion: a thought   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: Participation criterion: a thought   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Re: Participation criterion: a thought   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Participation examples   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Programming Question   Alex Small
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Re: Proposed method of cycle resolution   Chris Benham
• [EM] Query, Clones, MCA levels, Participation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Query, Clones, MCA levels, Participation   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Kislanko at aol.com
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Query for one and all   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Query for one and all   James Gilmour
• [EM] Query for one and all   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Query for one and all   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Query for one and all   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Query for one and all   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Query for one and all   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Query for one and all   John B. Hodges
• [EM] Query for one and all   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Query for one and all   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Query for one and all   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Query for one and all, Clones   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Query for one and all, Clones   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Reply to Robertas' Request for Opinion:   Donald Davison
• [EM] requesing help in converting pairwise matrix into preference rankings   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] requesing help in converting pairwise matrix into preference rankings   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Request for Information   Simon Gazeley
• [EM] Request for Information   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Request for opinion   robertas pogorelis
• [EM] Request for opinion   Simon Gazeley
• [EM] Request for opinion   James Gilmour
• [EM] Request for Ranked Pair strategy holes (margin, rm & wv)   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Request for Ranked Pair strategy holes (margin, rm & wv)   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Retraction--Approval Voting and Classical Mechanics   Alex Small
• [EM] RP(wv) to protect any Condorcet Winner   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] RWE, Participation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RWE, Participation   Eric Gorr
• [EM] RWE, Participation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RWE, Participation   Eric Gorr
• [EM] RWE, Participation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RWE, Participation   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Schulze; Beatpath Method; Schwartz Sequential Dropping   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Single-winner method to PR, part II   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Single-winner method to PR, part II   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Sorry for multiple posting   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Theoretical Justification for "Winning-Votes"   Markus Schulze
• [EM] to Donald (re David's message)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Truncation   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Truncation   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Truncation, defeat strength   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Truncation, defeat strength   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: Truncation, defeat strength   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Truncation, defeat strength, Landau   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Truncation, defeat strength, Landau   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: Truncation, defeat strength, Landau   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Truncation, defeat strength, Landau   Alex Small
• [EM] Truncation, defeat strength, Landau   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Woodall's "Descending Acquiescing Coalitions" method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Woodall's "Descending Acquiescing Coalitions" method   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Woodall's "Descending Acquiescing Coalitions" method   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Woodall's "Descending Acquiescing Coalitions" method   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Woodall's DAC, Plurality   Kevin Venzke

Last message date: Tue Sep 30 21:13:02 PDT 2003
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:31:12 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...