Fwd: [EM] Participation criterion: a thought

[Kislanko at aol.com]

>>So any method that fails consistency is surely also going to fail
participation, so it's no great surprise that Condorcet methods fail
participation.

Where's the error in my logic?<<

No error in your logic. We've known that consistency is not possible in any 
ranked-ballot method for 50 years.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20030920/026277d2/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Diana Galletly <dag1000 at eng.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: [EM] Participation criterion: a thought
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:16:47 +0100 (BST)
Size: 4057
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20030920/026277d2/attachment-0002.eml>