[EM] Re:"Runoff without Elimination", Condorcet efficiency

[Kevin Venzke]

Chris,

Actually I'm wondering if you perhaps mismatched these votes with other results.
You said IRV picks E, but E is the first candidate eliminated!

I don't think IRV is decisive in this scenario.

> > CB:I recently considered this method (and similar non-elimination versions of IRV), but
> > rejected it because it fails this example:
> > 
> > 51:A>B>C
> > 50:B>A>C
> > 100:C
> > 52:D>E>C
> > 49:E>D>C 
> > 302 votes. 
> > 
> > The CW (and Plurality winner) is C. IRV elects E. "RWE" elects the Bucklin winner,D.


___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com