[EM] Participation criterion: a thought

[Eric Gorr]

At 5:44 PM +0100 9/21/03, Diana Galletly wrote:
>On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Eric Gorr wrote:
>
>>  At 12:13 PM +0200 9/21/03, Kevin Venzke wrote:
>>  >But in most Participation failure examples
>>  >I've seen, the same candidate is not the winner in both sets.  For example,
>>  >for MCA:
>    ^^^^^^^
>
>>  What method did you use to determine that:
>>
>>     5:A>B>C
>>     4:B>C>A
>>     2:C>A>B
>>
>>  was B?
>
>Majority Choice Approval by the looks of it.

Yes...spotted it right after I send the message. Looks like it's time 
to apply standard excuse #12353...temporary blindness.