[EM] Query for one and all

[Kevin Venzke]

 --- Markus Schulze <markus.schulze at alumni.tu-berlin.de> a écrit : 
> Dear John B. Hodges,
> 
> you wrote (1 Sep 2003):
> > This method has been called "Generalized Bucklin", and AFAICT
> > could also be called "Majority Choice Approval". My question,
> > for one and all: Is there any desirable quality, that any
> > single-winner method has, that this method does not have?
> 
> Condorcet, Condorcet Loser, Consistency, Independence of Clones,
> Reversal Symmetry, Smith, later-no-harm, Participation.
> 
> Markus Schulze

John's definition didn't seem to allow for unused ranks, which I believe
is a necessary part of MCA.

I think MCA meets Clone Independence and Participation, but I'd like to hear
reasoning to the contrary.

Kevin Venzke
stepjak at yahoo.fr


___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com