February 2002 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Feb 1 00:33:46 PST 2002
Ending: Thu Feb 28 17:45:04 PST 2002
Messages: 297

• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Steve Barney
• [EM] Proof Borda Count best in the case of fully ranked preference ballots   Steve Barney
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Steve Barney
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Steve Barney
• Finding the probable best candidate? - CORRECTION   Steve Barney
• Finding the probable best candidate? - CORRECTION#2   Steve Barney
• Finding the probable best candidate? - CORRECTION#3   Steve Barney
• [EM] Proof Borda Count best in the case of fully ranked preference ballots   Steve Barney
• Finding the probable best candidate   Steve Barney
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Steve Barney
• Finding the probable best candidate? - IIA   Steve Barney
• [EM] Proof Borda Count best in the case of fully ranked preference ballots   Steve Barney
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Steve Barney
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Steve Barney
• Finding the probable best candidate   Steve Barney
• [EM] Ordinal vs Cardinal Ballots   Steve Barney
• [EM] 02/04/02 - Approval is only for Beauty Contests:   Mark Borg
• [STV-voting] 02/02/02 - The New South Wales council:   Crabb, Deane (PIRSA)
• [EM] Markus & Manipulability   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...)   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Finding the probable best candidate?   Blake Cretney
• [EM] To Blake, re: strategy   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Finding the probable best candidate?   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Finding the probable best candidate?   Blake Cretney
• To Blake re: strategy   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Re: Finding the probable best candidate?   Blake Cretney
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Winning-votes intuitive?   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Winning-votes intuitive?   Blake Cretney
• To Blake, re: strategy   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Winning-votes intuitive?   Blake Cretney
• [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp':   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/02/02 - FWD - WA State IRV bill hearing to be webcast:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/02/02 - FWD - The Australian Senate:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 0/03/02 - FWD - [instantrunoff] IRV @ Carleton College!   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/02/02 - Re: 01/31/02 - Two new design features for STV:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/04/02 - Welcome to the Hare camp:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/04/02 - Approval is only for Beauty Contests:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/04/02 - Approval is only for Beauty Contests:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/09/02 - Approval favors certain candidates:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/12/02 - Approval Voting via Plurality-at-Large:   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/12/02 - "If a Frog had Wings he wouldn't bump his ass"   Donald Davison
• [EM] A proposition to end apathy, if anyone cares   Donald Davison
• [EM] 02/28/02 - Successive Quota Surpluses for STV and IRVing:   Donald Davison
• [EM] IRV in WA state   Douglas Greene
• [EM] Summary of IRV activity in the states and a comment on the EC.   Douglas Greene
• [EM] Forward from Warren Smith   Douglas Greene
• [EM] IRV in WA state   Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV in WA state   Bart Ingles
• [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equalcandidates:   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Markus & Manipulability   Bart Ingles
• [EM] 02/09/02 - Approval favors certain candidates:   Bart Ingles
• [EM] To Blake, re: strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] To Blake, re: strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] [instantrunoff] Vote for the Oscars with IRV online!   Dan Johnson-Weinberger
• [EM] Kuro5hin discussion on Political Parties   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] To Blake, re: strategy   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Research on IRV and multiparty-ism   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Campaign Finance Reform: A Red Herring   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] To Blake, re: strategy   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Gibbard-Satterthwaite   Rob LeGrand
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Rob LeGrand
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Rob LeGrand
• Finding the probable best candidate? - CORRECTION   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Proof Borda Count best in the case of fully ranked preference ballots   Rob LeGrand
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Rob LeGrand
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Rob LeGrand
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Winning-votes intuitive?   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Broken link   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Margins vs. winning-votes   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Ranked Pairs vs. SSD vs. Plain Condorcet   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] 02/04/02 - Approval is only for Beauty Contests:   Richard Moore
• [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates:   Richard Moore
• [EM] 02/09/02 - Approval favors certain candidates:   Richard Moore
• [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates:   Richard Moore
• [EM] Finding the probable best candidate?   Richard Moore
• [EM] Plurality & Reguarity   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] my IIAC suggestion   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] My definition better carries out P&P's intent   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus & Manipulability   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply re: CVD. The Heritage Criterion.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Markus & Manipulability   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV's criteria successes?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] To Blake, re: standards   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Blake & strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV in WA state   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval, IRV, FBC, Blake   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Where is the political center? Where will it be?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Settle for how much less?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] To Donald on Approval & IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] To Blake, re: strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Finding the probable best candidate?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Summabililty, manipulability   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• To Blake re: strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Finding the probable best candidate?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• To Blake, re: strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Why RP(m) won't find the best candidate   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Winning Votes intuitive?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Is Winning Votes intuiltive?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Is Winning Votes intuitive?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• To Blake re: strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Margins vs Winning Votes   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Rob LG's definitions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists:   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...)   Olli Salmi
• Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...)   Olli Salmi
• Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...)   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Ammendment Methods (was: Vote Aggregation Methods)   Olli Salmi
• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Plurality & Reguarity   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus & Manipulability   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus & Manipulability   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Markus Schulze
• [EM] To Blake, re: strategy   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Finding the probable best candidate?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Smith Sets with >3 members   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Margins vs. winning-votes   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Smith Sets with >3 members   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Smith Sets with >3 members   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Smith Sets with >3 members   Markus Schulze
• [EM] World Series and EC   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] World Series and EC   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp':   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] IRV in WA state   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Settle for how much less?   Anthony Simmons
• Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...)   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Approval Voting in Action?   Anthony Simmons
• Approval Voting in Action?   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] To Blake, re: strategy   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney:   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Forest Simmons
• [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney:   Forest Simmons
• [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney:   Forest Simmons
• [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney:   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Forest Simmons
• [EM] 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp':   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Markus & Manipulability   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Markus & Manipulability   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Markus & Manipulability   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Markus & Manipulability   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake   Forest Simmons
• [EM] 02/04/02 - Approval is only for Beauty Contests:   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Definitions for Comparing Voting Power   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] PR/STV Hybrid for multi-winner?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval, IRV, FBC, Blake   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Markus & Manipulability   Forest Simmons
• [EM] To Blake, re: strategy   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   Forest Simmons
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• CSSE = Simmons' Method ?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• CSSE = Simmons' Method ?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Proof Borda Count best in the case of fully ranked preference ballots   Forest Simmons
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Proof Borda Count best in the case of fully ranked preference ballots   Forest Simmons
• Finding the probable best candidate   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• Finding the probable best candidate?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Winning-votes intuitive?   Forest Simmons
• Winning-votes intuitive?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Winning-votes intuitive?   Forest Simmons
• Winning-votes intuitive?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Approval Completed Condorcet   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Approval Completed Condorcet   Forest Simmons
• Finding the probable best candidate   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Smith Sets with >3 members   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Cumulative Repeated Approval Balloting for DSV   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Smith Sets with >3 members   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Smith Sets with >3 members   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Smith Sets with >3 members   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Definitions for Comparing Voting Power   Alex Small
• Re:[EM] IRV in WA state   Alex Small
• [EM] Re:Definitions for Comparing Voting Power   Alex Small
• Re: [EM] Definitions for Comparing Voting Power   Alex Small
• Re:[EM] Sincerity for criteria, Blake   Alex Small
• Re:[EM] Settle for how much less?   Alex Small
• [EM] Approval Voting in Action?   Alex Small
• [EM] Counting Large Numbers of Votes   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Winning-votes intuitive?   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Approval Completed Condorcet   Alex Small
• [EM] Smith Sets with >3 members   Alex Small
• [EM] Power of Voting Blocs   Alexander Small
• [EM] Re: Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp':   Alexander Small
• [EM] 02/01/02 - IRVing is superior in math, Steve Barney:   Adam Tarr
• [EM] 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp':   Adam Tarr
• [EM] 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists:   Adam Tarr
• [EM] 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists:   Adam Tarr
• [EM] 02/04/02 - Approval is only for Beauty Contests:   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   Adam Tarr
• [EM] 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates:   Adam Tarr
• [EM] IRV in WA state   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: Finding the probable best candidate?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: Finding the probable best candidate?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Finding the probable best candidate?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Winning-votes intuitive?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Winning-votes intuitive?   Adam Tarr
• Winning-votes intuitive?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Winning-votes intuitive?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Winning-votes intuitive?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Margins vs. winning-votes   Adam Tarr
• [EM] eurovision song contest   Jurij Toplak
• [EM] Book- Evaluation and Optimization of Electoral Systems   Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Markus & Manipulability   Joe Weinstein
• Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• World Series and EC   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• 02/02/02 - Alexander, don't get stuck in a `Time Warp':   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Book- Evaluation and Optimization of Electoral Systems   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Newcomers Claim New Orleans Runoff   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Kuro5hin discussion on Political Parties   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• 02/03/02 - STV for Candidate Lists:   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Markus & Manipulability   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Blake & strategy   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] State legislatures minority rule dats   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Definitions for Comparing Voting Power   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: IRV in WA state   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Condorcet PR (was Comparing ranked versus unranked methods)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] House Sets Campaign Finance Vote   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates:   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates:   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Definitions for Comparing Voting Power   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equalcandidates:   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Condorcet PR (was Comparing ranked versus unranked methods)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Scotland local govt P.R. story   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• 02/09/02 - Approval favors certain candidates:   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• 02/06/02 - Adam's 02/02 example of three equal candidates:   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Approval Voting in Action?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Yahoo email lists   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Approval Voting in Action?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Plurality loser   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Finding the probable best candidate?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Fla. Holds 1st Touchscreen Election   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• 02/12/02 - Approval Voting via Plurality-at-Large:   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Hitler's secretary dies aged 81   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Open and Closed Lists (was ...STV for Candidate...)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Comparing ranked versus unranked methods   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Finding the probable best candidate?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Finding the probable best candidate?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Dallas Mayor runoff election story   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Finding the probable best candidate?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Dallas Mayor runoff election story   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Counting Large Numbers of Votes   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Finding the probable best candidate?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Finding the probable best candidate?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Finding the probable best candidate?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Finding the probable best candidate?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Math Alive Lab6   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] More on FEC computerized voting   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Winning-votes intuitive?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Vote Aggregation Methods   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Approval Completed Condorcet   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Finding the probable best candidate?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] More on YES Votes   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] State Ordered to Replace Old Vote Machines   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Debate Over Measuring Voter Turnout   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Ranked Pairs vs. SSD vs. Plain Condorcet   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Margins vs Winning Votes   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Smith Sets with >3 members   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Steve Barney wants you to see this product at Amazon.com   barnes992001 at yahoo.com

Last message date: Thu Feb 28 17:45:04 PST 2002
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:30:38 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...