October 2000 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sun Oct 1 10:06:53 PDT 2000
Ending: Tue Oct 31 17:02:39 PST 2000
Messages: 211

• [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   Craig Carey
• [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   Markus Schulze
• [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   Craig Carey
• [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   Markus Schulze
• [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Quick elimination of useless rules: my Meta-rules   Craig Carey
• [EM] Quick elimination of useless rules: my Meta-rules   David Catchpole
• [EM] Quick elimination of useless rules: my Meta-rules   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Quick elimination of useless rules: my Meta-rules   David Catchpole
• [EM] Quick elimination of useless rules: my Meta-rules   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   Markus Schulze
• [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   Craig Carey
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleadingwebsite   Bart Ingles
• [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   Markus Schulze
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   Craig Carey
• [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   Craig Carey
• [EM] CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   Markus Schulze
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   David Catchpole
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• CVD wants Alt.V to be fairer but it isn't: misleading website   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FPP vs IRV: Monotonicity. Funny example.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FPP vs IRV: Monotonicity. Funny example.   David Catchpole
• [EM] FPP vs IRV: Monotonicity. Funny example.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The 6 paper 4W1CD problem solved.   Craig Carey
• [EM] 4W1CD problem: correction   Craig Carey
• [EM] Internet voting meeting (FWD)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   Craig Carey
• [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   David Catchpole
• [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   Craig Carey
• [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   David Catchpole
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   David Catchpole
• [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   David Catchpole
• [EM] Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   Bart Ingles
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   LAYTON Craig
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   Bart Ingles
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   LAYTON Craig
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   Bart Ingles
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   David Catchpole
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   LAYTON Craig
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   Bart Ingles
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   Bart Ingles
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   Craig Carey
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   Bart Ingles
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   LAYTON Craig
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   Bart Ingles
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   LAYTON Craig
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   LAYTON Craig
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   Bart Ingles
• Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Papers are voters: asserting aspects of voters   Craig Carey
• [EM]   JanetRAnderson
• [EM]   David Catchpole
• [EM] Janets questions   JanetRAnderson
• [EM] Janets questions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Janets questions   JanetRAnderson
• [EM] Janets questions   Craig Carey
• [EM] Craig's question   Bart Ingles
• Craig's question   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Craig's question   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM]   Bart Ingles
• [EM] ICCPR Article 25(b) violations of Washington Citizens for Proportional Representation   Craig Carey
• [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Clarifying Approval vs Condorcet   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] please remove from list   J Bravo
• [EM] please remove from list   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FW: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FW: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   LAYTON Craig
• [EM] FW: Methods of elimination in quota preferential STV   David Catchpole
• FW: [EM] Clarifying Approval vs Condorcet   LAYTON Craig
• FW: [EM] Clarifying Approval vs Condorcet   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] typo   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Losing with 99% of the vote: Mike tell us why   Craig Carey
• [EM] Losing with 99% of the vote: Mike tell us why   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Majorities (was Re: Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Majorities (was Re: Smith//PC , GSFC, & SDSC)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Blake Cretney: Can you prove this?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Blake Cretney: Can you prove this?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Mr O.: GSFC+SDSC pass for 'Tideman(wv)': the proof requested   Craig Carey
• [EM]   RJ Vein
• [EM]   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Janet: What's wrong with IRV (or some of it ).   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Part 2--What's wrong with IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Part 3--What's wrong with IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM]   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] CVD PDF brochure says IRV is "constitutional"   Craig Carey
  • [EM] CVD IRV elections halve and negate voters' votes.   Craig Carey
  • [EM] The 3 Matrices   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] This installment wasn't sent   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] IRV, SFC, WDSC examples   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Mike: Proof using GSFC & SDSC re-requested, new false claim occurred   Craig Carey
  • [EM] Biasing STV for women: not a possibility. Ireland transfer values in European Parliament elections   Craig Carey
  • [EM] About Arrow's theorem   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • About Arrow's theorem   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM]   LAYTON Craig
• [EM]   LAYTON Craig
  • [EM] Proxy P.R. method- Variable size body   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] Proxy P.R. method- Variable size body   LAYTON Craig
  • Proxy P.R. method- Variable size body   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • Proxy P.R. method- Variable size body   LAYTON Craig
  • [EM] ICANN elections held using IRV   Rob Lanphier
  • [EM] Lesser of 2 or more Evils   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] Lesser of 2 or more Evils   LAYTON Craig
  • [EM] Lesser of 2 or more Evils   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Place Votes and Sets in p.r. elections   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] Arrow in one sentence.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Approval- Cumulative Votes p.r. methods   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] Approval- Cumulative Votes p.r. methods   LAYTON Craig
  • [EM] RE: Approval- Cumulative Votes p.r. methods   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] RE: Approval- Cumulative Votes p.r. methods   LAYTON Craig
  • Approval- Cumulative Votes p.r. methods   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • Approval- Cumulative Votes p.r. methods   LAYTON Craig
  • [EM] Lowest YES p.r. elimination method   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] New STV mailing list has appeared!   Craig Carey
  • [EM] Oregon First To Use Mail-In Ballot   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] Fair Vote Canada postings (FWD)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] U.S. Gerrymander System- 2000 Census Version   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] Carnahan Will Remain On Ballot   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] STV is nonmontonic 24% of vote negated   Craig Carey
  • [EM] New ElectionReform Wiki   Rob Lanphier
  • [EM] A 27 character J program to elect winners   Craig Carey
  • A 27 character J program to elect winners   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] The powers of YES/NO/Approval are unequal; J prog calculates Borda weights   Craig Carey
  • [EM] The powers of YES/NO/Approval are unequal; J prog calculatesBorda weights   Bart Ingles
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   Bart Ingles
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   Rob Lanphier
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   Bart Ingles
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   Rob Lanphier
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   Bart Ingles
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   Blake Cretney
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Borda Count to the median   Michael A. Rouse
  • [EM] Borda Count to the median   David Catchpole
  • [EM] Borda Count to the median   Blake Cretney
  • Borda Count to the median   Mike Rouse
  • Borda Count to the median   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] Borda Count to the median   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Discover Magazine article   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] CVD IRV articles   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] CVD IRV articles   Bart Ingles
  • The powers of YES/NO/Approval are unequal   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] STV's Dirty Little Secrets   donald at mich.com
  • [EM] STV's Dirty Little Secrets   LAYTON Craig
  • [EM] STV's Dirty Little Secrets   Blake Cretney
  • [EM] Tideman & Beatpathwinner, winner comparison   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Majority Sets   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] NBC- Electoral College story   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] Fwd: Question about Limited Voting   donald at mich.com
  • [EM] Fwd: Question about Limited Voting   LAYTON Craig
  • [EM] Census-Gerrymander Info 27 Oct 2000   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] A better nonmonotonic rank-count   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Tideman vs Beatpathwinner   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Tideman vs Beatpathwinner   Blake Cretney
  • Question about Limited Voting   Donald E. Davison
  • [EM] Tideman's 'CEC' and 'CPO' methods   Martin Harper
  • [EM] Tideman's 'CEC' and 'CPO' methods   Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Tideman's 'CEC' and 'CPO' methods   Bart Ingles
  • [EM] Clones Oct 28, 2000   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] Clones Oct 28, 2000   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Truncated Votes- Divided Votes   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] Truncation issues   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] nonmonotonicity of the combo method   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • nonmonotonicity of the combo method   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] Salon discussion on IRV   Rob Lanphier
  • [EM] Salon discussion on IRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Place Votes Table- Math 101   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] 2 Nov 1999 Cambridge, Mass City Council Election - Summary Results   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] 2 Nov 1999 Cambridge, Mass City Council Election - Summary Results   Blake Cretney
  • [EM] 2 Nov 1999 Cambridge, Mass City Council Election - Summary Results   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
  • [EM] Letter to Discover Magazine   Bart Ingles
  • FW: [EM] 2 Nov 1999 Cambridge, Mass City Council Election - Summa ry Results   LAYTON Craig
  • [EM] Voice in government argument   Blake Cretney
  • [EM] Voice in government argument   LAYTON Craig

Last message date: Tue Oct 31 17:02:39 PST 2000
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:30:14 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...