[EM] Discover Magazine article
Markus Schulze
schulze at sol.physik.tu-berlin.de
Thu Oct 26 03:38:28 PDT 2000
Dear Mike,
I wrote (26 Oct 2000):
> Mike wrote (25 Oct 2000):
> > Ok, Markus, but what would you say to a suggestion that we
> > count the ballots by Tideman(wv) and by BeatpathWinner, and then
> > hold a 2nd balloting so people can vote which of those 2 winners
> > they prefer? That sounds democratic to me.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > If EM ever needs to vote on something, a good system might be
> > to count the ballots by BeatpathWinner and by Tideman(wv), and
> > choose the winner that pairwise-beats the other.
>
> I would say that this method violates independence from clones
> and monotonicity.
Correction: When we count the ballots by Tideman and Schulze and
then choose that candidate of these 2 winners whose worst pairwise
defeat is smaller then this would violate independence from clones.
When we count the ballots by Tideman and Schulze and then choose
that candidate of these 2 winners who is pairwise prefered by more
voters then this would violate monotonicity.
Markus Schulze
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list