[EM] Lowest YES p.r. elimination method
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
Sun Oct 15 08:42:47 PDT 2000
Yet another simple p.r. elimination method would be a lowest YES elimination
(combining parts of a YES/NO table and a Place Votes table).
Voters vote YES on desired choices and use Number Votes (1, 2, etc.).
A choice with first place votes that equal or exceed a Hare Quota (total
votes/ total seats) is elected.
The choice with the lowest number of YES choices loses. The lower choices on
the ballots involved move up. Repeat until N choices remain (who are
elected).
A variable sized body might have any choice getting at least X percent of the
first place votes being elected.
As usual, each winner should have a voting power in the legislative body
equal to the number of votes he/she receives.
Example- Elect 5 legislators in a district
First Place Votes
A 15
B 13
C 14
D 21
E 14 + 1 = 15
F 11 + 3 = 14
G 5 + 3 = 8
H 7 - 7 = 0
100
H has the lowest YES votes and loses. Note-- a loser may have more first
place votes than another choice.
A 15 + 5 = 20
B 13 -13 = 0
C 14 + 8 = 22
D 21
E 15
F 14
G 8
100
B now has the lowest YES votes and loses.
A 20
C 22
D 21
E 15 + 3 = 18
F 14 + 5 = 19
G 8 - 8 = 0
100
G now has the lowest YES votes and loses.
The above could be used also for single/ multiple winner elections for
executive and judicial offices (especially if there was no majority YES
choice(s) and it is not desired that the legislative body involved fill the
vacancy - noting also that any such single winner(s) might have governing
problems if he/she/they lacked a YES majority).
For M multiple winners (such as 2 judges), the earliest M places would be
added-
Place Votes
1 2
J 35 17
K 14 40
As usual-- since Head to Head is NOT done in the above (greatly adding some
complexity), it is technically defective.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list