[EM]

[David Catchpole]

On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, JanetRAnderson wrote:

> May I interrupt your discussion for a moment to ask a couple of questions?
> 
> (I currently chair Washington Citizens for Proportional Representation and I
> believe this list began from our Web site.  I have been a silent member of
> the list for the last couple of months, just to see what was going on.)
> 
> I am disturbed by the negative references to CVD and the League of Women
> Voters new national study.  I am trying to influence the content of the

It's just Craig. You could _try_ getting his reasons...

> latter.  Could you put in simple, layman's words (not formulas), what is so
> bad about IRV for single winner offices?  Are you so adamant in your
> opposition that you will actively and publicly oppose any tiny steps toward
> Choice Voting that those of us working in the education trenches try to
> make?
> 
> I am a teacher and strong supporter of STV.  If there is something better,
> that you can make understandable to me, and that I can help make
> understandable to others, I'd like to hear about it on or off the list..
>  Thank you.
> JanetRAnderson at msn.com
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig Carey" <research at ijs.co.nz>
> To: <election-methods-list at eskimo.com>
> Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 11:02 PM
> Subject: [EM] Papers are voters: asserting aspects of voters
> 
> 
> > I ask subscribers to regard this as a puzzle that I haven't understood.
> > Yet there seems to be little stated concern that the list is less than
> > what subscribers might want or hope for.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I only said we'd make it across"
				-"Road Trip"