April 2004 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Apr 1 00:28:01 PST 2004
Ending: Fri Apr 30 23:37:03 PDT 2004
Messages: 248

• [EM] Re: Approval STV   Chris Benham
• [EM] Marcus Schulze 2003 on Bucklin's technical shortcomings   Chris Benham
• [EM] [EM]Re: Marcus Schulze 2003 on Bucklin   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Weighted Mean Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Weighted Median Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Weighted Median Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Weighted Median Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Weighted Median Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Weighted Median Approval   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Weighted Median Approval (correction regarding QLTD)   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Chris's example, Bucklin, A wins   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: A "Runoff" type method for resolution of cycles in condorcet   Chris Benham
• [EM] Congressional Size   Lloyd Caesar
• [EM] IRV, ICC, and Incomplete Ballots   Fan de Condorcet
• [EM] electoral college/ two-party-duopoly   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Draft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV in Utah   Eric Gorr
• [EM] About IRV   Eric Gorr
• [EM] IRV letter   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: IRV Letter   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Eric Gorr
• [EM] A "Runoff" type method for resolution of cycles in condorcet   Eric Gorr
• [EM] A "Runoff" type method for resolution of cycles incondorcet   Eric Gorr
• [EM] A "Runoff" type method for resolution of cycles incondorcet   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Are cycles a problem in practice?   Eric Gorr
• [EM] AccuPoll   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Draft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Draft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Draft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] my letter to CVD   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] my letter to CVD   James Green-Armytage
• serious centrist candidate Re: [EM] my letter to CVD   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Conceding Victory   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] proxified electoral college (was: PR vs Single-Winner Reform)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] proxified electoral college (was: PR vs Single-Winner Reform)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Implementable Proxy system   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] To James A., about Bucklin & ERIRV   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Draft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Hello again -- and a new method for you!   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Hello again -- and a new method for you!   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Hello again -- and a new method for you!   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Hello again -- and a new method for you!   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Need a little help...   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet but not in IRV?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: Weak INI -- three possibilities   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Banks//Approval fulfils INI/ICI   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet but not in IRV?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] River method - a refinement, minor computational evidence, and a generalized IPDA criterion ISDA   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] River method - a refinement, minor computational evidence, and a generalized IPDA criterion ISDA   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] serious strategy problem in Condorcet but not in IRV?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Some unfortunately too strong Defensive Strategy Criterion   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Primaries?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Condorcet subject to burying   Bart Ingles
• [EM] my letter to CVD   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?   Bart Ingles
• [EM] What I mean by "strong FBC"   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Green Party Candidate Strategy   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #607 - 3 msgs   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Some unfortunately too strong Defensive Strategy Criterion   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Some unfortunately too strong Defensive Strategy Criterion   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply...   Ken Johnson
• [EM] [instantrunoff] Drafft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Open Voting Consortium for e-voting?   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply...   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Elections methods performance criterion   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Open Voting Consortium for e-voting?   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Open Voting Consortium for e-voting?   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Re: [instantrunoff] Drafft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] March 29 Newsweek article on verifiable voting   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] E-Voting   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] March 29 Newsweek article on verifiable voting   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] March 29 Newsweek article on verifiable voting   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] March 29 Newsweek article on verifiable voting   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Doing better Presdential electors   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Usefol Peoxies   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Weighted Median Approval   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] About IRV   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] A "Runoff" type method for resolution of cycles incondorcet   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Approval-Elimination IRV fails FBC; AERLO   Paul Kislanko
• FW: [EM] Approval-Elimination IRV fails FBC; AERLO   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Open Voting Consortium for e-voting?   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] March 29 Newsweek article on verifiable voting   Jan Kok
• [EM] March 29 Newsweek article on verifiable voting   Jan Kok
• [EM] Gearing up for India's electronic election   Gervase Lam
• [EM] calculating margins in condorcet   Gervase Lam
• [EM] calculating margins in condorcet   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Bucklin   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Bucklin not clone-independent   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Congressional Size   Mike
• [EM] > 2. Re: Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion'   Richard Moore
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply...   Richard Moore
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives   Richard Moore
• [EM] Methods passing or failing INI   Richard Moore
• [EM] Re: Methods passing or failing INI   Richard Moore
• [EM] Weak INI -- three possibilities   Richard Moore
• [EM] Weak INI -- three possibilities   Richard Moore
• [EM] Re: Weak INI -- three possibilities   Richard Moore
• [EM] PR Condorcet algorithm implemented as experiment   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Re: PR Condorcet algorithm implemented as experiment   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Are cycles a problem in practice?   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Are cycles a problem in practice?   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Re: IRV Letter   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #607 - 3 msgs   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] pSTV v0.4   Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] To James A., about Bucklin & ERIRV   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval vs ERIRV with AERLO   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] What I mean by "strong FBC"   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Webster vs Hare for PR   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] PR vs Single-Winner Reform   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply about Strong FBC & ERBucklin(whole)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Clarification of AERLO & Strong FBC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval-Elimination IRV fails FBC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] RE: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #581 - 8 msgs   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Weighted Mean Approval   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] AERLO definition for ERBucklin & ERIRV. Yes ERBucklin needs AERLO for Strong FBC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Bucklin, the Supreme Court, LNH   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Which method isn't "vulnerable to compromise"?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Smith wins in the Bucklin example   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] When 2 candidates have majorities in Bucklin   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV letter   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] CR with AERLO   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] "Serious stragtegy problem of Condorcet but not IRV"?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris's example, Buckliln, A wins.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] River method - a refinement, minor computational evidence, and a generalized IPDA criterion ISDA   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Dr.Ernie Prabhakar
• [EM] Open Voting Consortium for e-voting?   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Draft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   Ernest Prabhakar
• serious centrist candidate Re: [EM] my letter to CVD   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] March 29 Newsweek article on verifiable voting   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Hello again -- and a new method for you!   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Hello again -- and a new method for you!   Ernest Prabhakar
• Fwd: [EM] Open Voting Consortium for e-voting?   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Open Voting Consortium for e-voting?   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] MAM-d vs. The River   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] calculating margins in condorcet   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] calculating margins in condorcet   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Condorcet subject to burying   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Draft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Implementable Proxy system   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] calculating margins in condorcet   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] calculating margins in condorcet   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] How many candidates are treated fairly?   Tom Ruen
• [EM] Methods passing or failing INI   Markus Schulze
• [EM] To James A., about Bucklin & ERIRV   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Hello again -- and a new method for you!   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Which method isn't "vulnerable to compromise"?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Hello again -- and a new method for you!   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Banks//Approval fulfils INI/ICI   Markus Schulze
• [EM] MAM-d vs. The River   Markus Schulze
• [EM] League of Women Voters   Markus Schulze
• [EM] A "Runoff" type method for resolution of cycles in condorcet   Markus Schulze
• [EM] calculating margins in condorcet   Curt Siffert
• [EM] IRV letter   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Re: IRV Letter   Curt Siffert
• [EM] electoral college/ two-party-duopoly   Curt Siffert
• [EM] electoral college/ two-party-duopoly   Curt Siffert
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Curt Siffert
• [EM] condorcet/borda   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a Condorcet Winner ?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Candidate Transfer   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Approval STV   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Bucklin   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Bucklin   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Conceding Victory   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Conceding Victory   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Bucklin and detecting the highest generalized median rank   Forest Simmons
• [EM] PR vs Single-Winner Reform   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Conceding Victory   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Weighted Mean Approval   Forest Simmons
• [EM] PR vs Single-Winner Reform   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Green Party Candidate Strategy   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Weighted Median Approval   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a   Alex Small
• [EM] Bucklin   Alex Small
• [EM] PR vs Single-Winner Reform   Alex Small
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a Condorcet Winner ?   Rob Speer
• [EM] Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?   Sampo Syreeni
• [EM] Does the 'Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion' Imply a   Adam Tarr
• [EM] March 29 Newsweek article on verifiable voting   Adam Tarr
• [EM] my letter to CVD   Adam Tarr
• [EM] March 29 Newsweek article on verifiable voting   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?   Adam Tarr
• [EM] March 29 Newsweek article on verifiable voting   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: IRV Letter   Adam Tarr
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Adam Tarr
• [EM] PR Condorcet algorithm implemented as experiment   Adam H Tarr
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Adam H Tarr
• [EM] electoral college/ two-party-duopoly   Adam H Tarr
• [EM] electoral college/Serious thoughts   Adam H Tarr
• [EM] electoral college/ two-party-duopoly   Adam H Tarr
• [EM] Draft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   Ken Taylor
• [EM] Draft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   Ken Taylor
• [EM] Draft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   Ken Taylor
• [EM] A "Runoff" type method for resolution of cycles in condorcet   Ken Taylor
• [EM] A "Runoff" type method for resolution of cycles incondorcet   Ken Taylor
• [EM] A "Runoff" type method for resolution of cycles incondorcet   Ken Taylor
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   Ken Taylor
• [EM] A "Runoff" type method for resolution of cycles incondorcet   Ken Taylor
• [EM] Re: Approval STV   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Bucklin, QLTD   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] I mean I agree SMITH wins (no text)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Approval-Elimination IRV fails FBC; AERLO   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Approval-Elimination IRV fails FBC   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] QLTD   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] demonstration, IRV elim order and monotonicity   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] CR with AERLO   Kevin Venzke
• Re [EM] PR Condorcet algorithm implemented as experiment   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Draft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] Draft of CVD analysis about IRV vs. Condorcet Voting   RLSuter at aol.com
• [EM] questions about SF's version of IRV   sdfgdfg sdfgdfs
• [EM] Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Random Method [WAS: Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?]   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Is strategic voting a bad thing, really?   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] About IRV   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] IRV letter   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   wclark at xoom.org
• [EM] Re: IRV letter   wclark at xoom.org

Last message date: Fri Apr 30 23:37:03 PDT 2004
Archived on: Thu Jan 8 17:24:22 PST 2009

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...