[EM] Bucklin not clone-independent
Rob LeGrand
honky1998 at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 8 16:25:16 PDT 2004
Mike Ossipoff wrote:
> By the way, if anyone knows of an example in which Buckling fails
> Independence from Clones, would they post it?
20:A>B>C
17:B>C>A
13:C>A>B
B wins under (usual) Bucklin.
20:D>A>B>C
17:B>C>A>D
13:C>A>D>B
Now A wins, so adding a clone of A (D, which doesn't win) caused B to lose.
=====
Rob LeGrand, psephologist
rob at approvalvoting.org
Citizens for Approval Voting
http://www.approvalvoting.org/
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list