February 2005 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Feb 1 00:12:44 PST 2005
Ending: Mon Feb 28 23:48:23 PST 2005
Messages: 224

• [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution   Steven Barney
• [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution   Steven Barney
• [EM] Iterative quota voting   Chris Benham
• [EM] How to break this tie?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: optimal Condorcet truncation   Chris Benham
• [EM] "summability"   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] "summability"   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] primary election thoughts   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] primary elections   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Craig: I did include ballot-counting code   Craig Carey
• [EM] SCHULZE never used word "fairness" (was Re: MIKE OSSIPOFF vs The list...   Craig Carey
• [EM] question about open party list PR   James Cooper
• [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Who defined the Smith set   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Iterative quota voting   James Gilmour
• [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option   James Gilmour
• [EM] Re: lying to pollsters   Eric Gorr
• [EM] candidate withdrawal option and burying   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] cardinal pairwise (previously written messages)   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Definitions?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Definitions?   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Who defined the Smith set   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] RaMON, a method in honour of Ramon Llull   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] R.B.MacSmith   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] How to break this tie?   Nathan Herring
• [EM] lying to pollsters (was comparative effectiveness ...)   Bart Ingles
• [EM] primary election thoughts   Bart Ingles
• [EM] primary election thoughts   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Condorcet package   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] A few more poll comments   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Threat/Promise Approval strategy. Summary of strategies.   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Paul reply   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Acronyms need to spelled out   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Meaning of preference, four approaches   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Comparative Effectiveness of Approval and Condorcet in the case of a three candidate cycle.   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Clock Methods   Gervase Lam
• [EM] optimal Condorcet truncation   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Approval equivalent to Condorcet-random :-)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] typo   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A few posting comments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Misinformation in Approval, 3 candidates   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A few more poll comments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: A few more poll comments   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Subcycle methods of 1996   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Subcycle methods of 1996   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Threat/Promise Approval strategy. Summary of strategies.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Cardinal Pairwise   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Paul reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Paul reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Comments on Approval strategy posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Black box election method tests--Is it possible?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Definitions?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Two strategy definitions from March ´04   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Wording of March strategy definition   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Who defined the Smith set   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Lottery methods. wv between all possible lotteries? New methods.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] It uses ratings balloting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Some criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: How to vote in Approval   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Omission from equilibrium criteria. Renaming.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Approval strategy reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Comments on Approval strategy posting   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval strategy at Russ´s website   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ asks about my criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] EM criteria discussions   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ reply, 1235 GMT, 2/25/05   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ and the pecking-order   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ and his pecking order   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, criteria (was Markus reply)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus, criteria (was Markus reply)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Who first proposed wv Condorcet   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Alex reply   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Meaning of preference, four approaches   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Markus, criteria   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] More comments on approaches to preference   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Who first proposed wv   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Russ, Criteria that mention preference   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval strategy for Condorcet?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] How to break this tie?   Brian Olson
• [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Comparative Effectiveness of Approval and Condorcet in the case of a three candidate cycle.   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Craig: I did include ballot-counting code   Russ Paielli
• [EM] SCHULZE never used word "fairness" (was Re: MIKE OSSIPOFF vs The list...   Russ Paielli
• [EM] lying to pollsters (was comparative effectiveness ...)   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Schulze Condorcet algorithms in Python   Russ Paielli
• [EM] "summability"   Russ Paielli
• [EM] "summability"   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Threat/Promise Approval strategy. Summary of strategies.   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Deciding which Candidates to Approve   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Approval equivalent to Condorcet-random :-)   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: How to vote in Approval   Russ Paielli
• [EM] The Approval Formula   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Approval strategy reply   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Approval strategy at Russ´s website   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Omission from equilibrium criteria. Renaming.   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Russ asks about my criteria   Russ Paielli
• [EM] EM criteria discussions   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Markus reply   Russ Paielli
• [EM] optimal Condorcet truncation   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Markus reply   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Meaning of preference, four approaches   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Markus reply   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Approval strategy for Condorcet?   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Markus, criteria   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Russ, Criteria that mention preference   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: optimal Condorcet truncation   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Markus, criteria   Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 8, Issue 4   William Redpath
• [EM] Iterative quota voting   Jim & Mary Ronback
• [EM] Black box election method tests - is it possible?   Jim & Mary Ronback
• [EM] Acronyms need to spelled out   Jim & Mary Ronback
• [EM] Criteria   Jim & Mary Ronback
• [EM] Why bicameralism ?   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Why bicameralism ?   Stephane Rouillon
• MIKE OSSIPOFF vs The list (Re: [EM] I didn't choose to be the topic   Markus Schulze
• MIKE OSSIPOFF vs The list (Re: [EM] I didn't choose to be the topic   Markus Schulze
• [EM] SCHULZE never used word "fairness" (was Re: MIKE OSSIPOFF vs The list...   Markus Schulze
• [EM] How to break this tie?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] How to break this tie?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] How to break this tie?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] How to break this tie?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Candidate withdrawal option   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Black box election method tests - is it possible?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] How to break this tie?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Definitions?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Definitions?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] sprucing up   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus' request   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus' request   Markus Schulze
• [EM] EM criteria discussions   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Who First Proposed Winning Votes?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Who First Proposed Winning Votes?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Meaning of preference, four approaches   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus reply   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus, criteria   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Who First Proposed Winning Votes?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Meaning of preference, four approaches   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution   Curt Siffert
• [EM] Clock Methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] (no subject)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] reply to Dan Bishop's "Condorcet Failure ..."   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Comparative Effectiveness of Approval and Condorcet in the case of a three candidate cycle.   Forest Simmons
• [EM] apology for "no subject" posting   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Lottery Methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election   Forest Simmons
• [EM] lying to pollsters (was comparative effectiveness ...)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: lying to pollsters   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: RAMON   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: A few more poll comments   Forest Simmons
• [EM] How to break this tie?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: How to break this tie?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Clock Methods   Forest Simmons
• [EM] How to break this tie?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings   Forest Simmons
• [EM] more on lotteries   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: sprucing up   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Markus' request   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Lottery methods. wv between all possible lotteries? New methods.   Forest Simmons
• [EM] lotteries   Forest Simmons
• [EM] axioms for lotteries   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Iterative Ranked Approval Voting   Alex Small
• [EM] primary election thoughts   Alex Small
• [EM] primary elections   Alex Small
• [EM] Enough is enough   Alex Small
• [EM] Simple Election Methods and Geometry   Alex Small
• [EM] Simple Election Methods and Geometry   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Markus, criteria   Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Markus' request   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Markus' request   Ted Stern
• [EM] primary election thoughts   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: primary election thoughts   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Ted Stern
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] optimal Condorcet truncation   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Markus, criteria   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Markus, criteria   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Simple Election Methods and Geometry   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Vote in Online British Columbia STV Poll !!!!   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Who First Proposed Winning Votes?   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] question about open party list PR   jure.toplak at uni-mb.si

Last message date: Mon Feb 28 23:48:23 PST 2005
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:31:50 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...