[EM] Re: Markus, criteria

[Russ Paielli]

Alex Small alex_small2002-at-yahoo.com |EMlist| wrote:

> If my intuition is born out by the complete proof, what I'll basically 
> show is that only 1 ranked method satisfies strong FBC, sometimes 
> referred to as "Top 2 Voting" or "Anti-Plurality Voting":  Each voter 
> ranks the candidates and the top 2 candidates on each ballot get one 
> point each.  The only reason this can be called "strong FBC" is that 

Unless there's more to it than you said, I don't see how that even 
qualifies as a ranked method. It seems like Approval with the 
restriction that only two candidates can be approved. Am I missing 
something?

--Russ