[EM] EM criteria discussions

[Markus Schulze]

Dear Mike,

you wrote (24 Feb 2005):
> Though there's been nearly no interest in my criteria
> on EM, that doesn't mean that they haven't been discussed
> on EM. They've been thoroughly discussed here. Bruce
> Anderson, Markus, Blake, and Richard have been kind enough
> to industriously help look for faults in the criteria,
> often very valianly and tenaciously.  But without finding
> problems in the criteria.

I would rather say that I gave up asking you for clear
definitions.

Markus Schulze