November 2009 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sun Nov 1 00:11:41 PDT 2009
Ending: Sun Nov 29 16:34:26 PST 2009
Messages: 245

• [EM] (no subject)   Anthony O'Neal
• [EM] (no subject)   James Gilmour
• [EM] (no subject)   Raph Frank
• [EM] (no subject)   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] (no subject) STV transfer rules   James Gilmour
• [EM] (no subject) STV transfer rules   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] (no subject)   Raph Frank
• [EM] (no subject)   Juho
• [EM] (no subject)   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] (no subject)   Juho
• [EM] (no subject)   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] (no subject)   Warren Smith
• [EM] (no subject)   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] (no subject)   Warren Smith
• [EM] (no subject)   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Raph Frank
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   James Gilmour
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Juho
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Raph Frank
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Juho
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Raph Frank
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Juho
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Juho
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Raph Frank
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   James Gilmour
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Juho
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Raph Frank
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Raph Frank
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Raph Frank
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Juho
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Raph Frank
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Juho
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   James Gilmour
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   James Gilmour
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Juho
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Juho
• [EM] STV - the transferrable part is OK (fair), the sequential round elimination is not   Anthony O'Neal
• [EM] Asset voting and so forth, in practice   Michael Allan
• [EM] Asset voting and so forth, in practice   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Asset voting and so forth, in practice   Michael Allan
• [EM] press release on voting methods - help distribute it   Warren Smith
• [EM] Kathy D, would you be so kind to respond to the question i asked?   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Kathy D, would you be so kind to respond to the question i asked?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   Brian Olson
• [EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Proportional Representation from Ratings Ballots   Brian Olson
• [EM] Proportional Representation from Ratings Ballots   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Proportional Representation from Ratings Ballots   Raph Frank
• [EM] Proportional Representation from Ratings Ballots   Brian Olson
• [EM] Proportional Representation from Ratings Ballots   Raph Frank
• [EM] Proportional Representation from Ratings Ballots   Raph Frank
• [EM] Proportional Representation from Ratings Ballots   Raph Frank
• [EM] Proportional Representation from Ratings Ballots   Raph Frank
• [EM] Proportional Representation from Ratings Ballots   Warren Smith
• [EM] Proportional Representation from Ratings Ballots   Warren Smith
• [EM] Proportional Representation from Ratings Ballots   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Proportional Representation from Ratings Ballots   Raph Frank
• [EM] Fw: About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] Fw: About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   Bob Richard
• [EM] Fw: About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...   Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] Brian Olson's multiwinner IRNR idea seems busted   Warren Smith
• [EM] Brian Olson's multiwinner IRNR idea seems busted   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Brian Olson's multiwinner IRNR idea seems busted   Raph Frank
• [EM] Brian Olson's multiwinner IRNR idea seems busted   Warren Smith
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Matthew Welland
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Raph Frank
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Raph Frank
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Warren Smith
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Raph Frank
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Raph Frank
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Raph Frank
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Juho
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting? (long)   Matthew Welland
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting? (long)   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting? (long)   Raph Frank
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting? (long)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting? (long)   Juho
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting? (long)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting? (long)   Raph Frank
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting? (long)   Matthew Welland
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting? (long)   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting? (long)   Juho
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting? (long)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting? (long)   Juho
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting? (long)   Matthew Welland
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting? (long)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Michael Allan
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approvalandrange voting?   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Raph Frank
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Chris Benham
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Juho
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval andrange voting?   James Gilmour
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting?   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Anyone got a good analysis on limitations of approval and range voting   Warren Smith
• [EM] Bouricius reply, BR, Tideman, recent USA elections   Warren Smith
• [EM] Bouricius reply, BR, Tideman, recent USA elections   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Bouricius reply, BR, Tideman, recent USA elections   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Bouricius reply, BR, Tideman, recent USA elections   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Bouricius reply, BR, Tideman, recent USA elections   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Bouricius reply, BR, Tideman, recent USA elections   Warren Smith
• [EM] NESD and NESD* properties of a single-winner voting method   Warren Smith
• [EM] NESD and NESD* properties of a single-winner voting method   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] NESD and NESD* properties of a single-winner voting method   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] NESD and NESD* properties of a single-winner voting method   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] NESD and NESD* properties of a single-winner voting method   Warren Smith
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Juho
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Warren Smith
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Warren Smith
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Warren Smith
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Warren Smith
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Juho
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Dectecting Clone Sets   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Dectecting Clone Sets   Juho
• [EM] Dectecting Clone Sets   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Dectecting Clone Sets   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] Dectecting Clone Sets   Juho
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Andrew Myers
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Raph Frank
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Warren Smith
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Warren Smith
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Raph Frank
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Warren Smith
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Warren Smith
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] A Proportionally Fair Consensus Lottery for which Sincere Range Ballots are Optimal   Juho
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] strategy-free Condorcet method after all!   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Condorcet strategies (was: strategy-free Condorcet method after all!)   Juho
• [EM] Question regarding Copeland variant   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Question regarding Copeland variant   Warren Smith
• [EM] What does "proportional representation" MEAN? And list of known PR methods (know any more?)   Warren Smith
• [EM] What does "proportional representation" MEAN? And list of known PR methods (know any more?)   Warren Smith
• [EM] What does "proportional representation" MEAN? And list of known PR methods (know any more?)   Raph Frank
• [EM] What does "proportional representation" MEAN? And list of known PR methods (know any more?)   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] What does "proportional representation" MEAN? And list of known PR methods (know any more?)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] What does "proportional representation" MEAN? And list of known PR methods (know any more?)   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] What does "proportional representation" MEAN? And list of known PR methods (know any more?) correction   fsimmons at pcc.edu
• [EM] What does "proportional representation" MEAN? And list of known PR methods (know any more?)   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Is there a PR voting method obeying "participation" criterion?   Warren Smith
• [EM] Is there a PR voting method obeying "participation" criterion?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Is there a PR voting method obeying "participation" criterion?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Is there a PR voting method obeying "participation" criterion?   Terry Bouricius
• [EM] Is there a PR voting method obeying "participation" criterion?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Another auto districting proposal (Crystal districting?)   Raph Frank
• [EM] Another auto districting proposal (Crystal districting?)   Juho
• [EM] Another auto districting proposal (Crystal districting?)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Another auto districting proposal (Crystal districting?)   Juho
• [EM] Another auto districting proposal (Crystal districting?)   Raph Frank
• [EM] Another auto districting proposal (Crystal districting?)   Juho
• [EM] Another auto districting proposal (Crystal districting?)   Brian Olson
• [EM] Another auto districting proposal (Crystal districting?)   Juho
• [EM] Another auto districting proposal (Crystal districting?)   Raph Frank
• [EM] Multipile Transferable Votes   Stephen H. Sosnick
• [EM] Multipile Transferable Votes   Raph Frank
• [EM] Multipile Transferable Votes   Raph Frank
• [EM] Does this method have a name, pt II   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] VoteFair ranking as a PR method   Richard Fobes
• [EM] n-th order Copeland questions   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Helping a candidate in the case of ties   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Helping a candidate in the case of ties   Juho
• [EM] Helping a candidate in the case of ties   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Helping a candidate in the case of ties   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Helping a candidate in the case of ties   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Helping a candidate in the case of ties   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Helping a candidate in the case of ties   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV is best method meeting 'later no harm'?   Warren Smith
• [EM] IRV is best method meeting 'later no harm'?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] IRV is best method meeting 'later no harm'?   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] IRV is best method meeting 'later no harm'?   Chris Benham
• [EM] IRV is best method meeting 'later no harm'?   Chris Benham
• [EM] IRV is best method meeting 'later no harm'?   seppley at alumni.caltech.edu
• [EM] IRV is best method meeting 'later no harm'?   Raph Frank
• [EM] IRV is best method meeting 'later no harm'?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] IRV is best method meeting 'later no harm'?   James Gilmour
• [EM] IRV is best method meeting 'later no harm'?   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Minneapolis instant runoff voting - lowest turnout since 1902   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Multiwinner unanimity criteria   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Block group map of Texas   Raph Frank
• [EM] Block group map of Texas   Raph Frank
• [EM] Block group map of Texas   Brian Olson
• [EM] [ESF #420] Points, regions and contiguity   Raph Frank

Last message date: Sun Nov 29 16:34:26 PST 2009
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:34:22 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...