[EM] About non-monotonicity and non-responding to previous posts...

[Kristofer Munsterhjelm]

robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> being pretty much completely converted to the condorcet faith, i have no 
> problem with non-monotonicity that happens to non-condorcet winners.  i 
> still do not understand any realistic scenario where non-monotonicity 
> affects the condorcet winner.

What is your opinion regarding methods, such as Nanson, Baldwin, and 
Raynaud, that are nonmonotonic when there is no Condorcet winner? Do 
Condorcet winners appear often enough in reality that it is not a problem?