December 2005 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Dec 1 02:50:25 PST 2005
Ending: Fri Dec 30 16:40:08 PST 2005
Messages: 211

• [EM] "scored condorcet", etc   rob brown
• [EM] #ballots with both truncation and equalities allowed   Warren Smith
• [EM] #ballots with both truncation and equalities allowed - correction   Warren Smith
• [EM] #ballots with both truncation and equalities allowed - correction   Warren Smith
• [EM] 10% as much as possible... :)   Warren Smith
• [EM] 10% as much as possible... :)   rob brown
• [EM] [ER] FBC-complying Margins-like method (?)   Chris Benham
• [EM] [ER] FBC-complying Margins-like method (?)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] [ER] FBC-complying Margins-like method (?)   Chris Benham
• [EM] [instantrunoff] Eugene, OR: 'Top Two' ballot method would restrict choice   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] [instantrunoff] plurality isn't so bad   Jeremy Friesner
• [EM] Advantage of MDDA over Approval?   Jan Kok
• [EM] Advantage of MDDA over Approval?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Advantage of MDDA over Approval?   Anthony Duff
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2.   rob brown
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2.   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2.   rob brown
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2.   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2.   rob brown
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2.   rob brown
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2.   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2.   rob brown
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2.   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2.   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2.   rob brown
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2.   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Approval and cycles   rob brown
• [EM] Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium   Jan Kok
• [EM] Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium   rob brown
• [EM] Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium   rob brown
• [EM] Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] ballots with equalities & truncations allowed   Warren Smith
• [EM] Benham's pairwise margins FBC method   Warren Smith
• [EM] Brams-Sanver   Warren Smith
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda   Dan Bishop
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda   Chris Benham
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda   Dan Bishop
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda   Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda   Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda   Chris Benham
• [EM] Correlation methods (was Correlated Instant Borda Runoff)   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] counting ballots   Warren Smith
• [EM] counting ballots   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] election-methods at electorama.com   Warren Smith
• [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 18, Issue 7   Warren Smith
• [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 18, Issue 7   James Gilmour
• [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 18, Issue 7   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Fixing Range Voting   rob brown
• [EM] Fixing Range Voting   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Fixing Range Voting   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Fixing Range Voting   rob brown
• [EM] Fixing Range Voting   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Fwd: Re: Why Utility is more important than "transvestite Inversion Property" - reply to Venzke, Gilmour   cbenhamau
• [EM] Fwd: Re: Why Utility is more important than "transvestite Inversion Property" - reply to Venzke, Gilmour   cbenhamau
• [EM] Group strategy (was Re: Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] history of random component in government   Stephen Turner
• [EM] history of random component in government   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Steve Eppley
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   rob brown
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   James Gilmour
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   rob brown
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Steve Eppley
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   rob brown
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   rob brown
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   rob brown
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   James Gilmour
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   James Gilmour
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   rob brown
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   James Gilmour
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   rob brown
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   rob brown
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] interpolated median   rob brown
• [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting   rob brown
• [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting   rob brown
• [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting   Yves Dandurand
• [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting   rob brown
• [EM] More results about... correction   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] More results about computer simulations of elections   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] More results about computer simulations of elections - without need of a computer!   Warren Smith
• [EM] More results about computer simulations of elections pt 2   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   rob brown
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   rob brown
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   rob brown
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   James Gilmour
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   rob brown
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   rob brown
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   rob brown
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   rob brown
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   rob brown
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates   rob brown
• [EM] oops   Warren Smith
• [EM] plurality isn't so bad   ban at richardwinger.com
• [EM] plurality isn't so bad   rob brown
• [EM] plurality isn't so bad   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] plurality isn't so bad   Bob Richard
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   rob brown
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   rob brown
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   Dan Bishop
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   rob brown
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   Dan Bishop
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   rob brown
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   rob brown
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   Chris Benham
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] range voting - strength of feeling   Warren Smith
• [EM] range voting - strength of feeling   James Gilmour
• [EM] range voting fix try #2 by Rob Brown   Warren Smith
• [EM] range voting fix try #2 by Rob Brown   rob brown
• [EM] range voting fix try #2 by Rob Brown   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] range voting fix try #2 by Rob Brown   rob brown
• [EM] range voting fix try #2 by Rob Brown   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] range voting mind-bogglingly stupid? (Reply to Rob Brown re voter strategy)   Warren Smith
• [EM] range voting mind-bogglingly stupid? (Reply to Rob Brown re voter strategy)   rob brown
• [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting   Warren Smith
• [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting   James Gilmour
• [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting   rob brown
• [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting   James Gilmour
• [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] reply to Venzke's confusion   Warren Smith
• [EM] reply to Venzke's confusion   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] reply to Venzke's confusion (small correction)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] reply to venzke re utility, approval, range   Warren Smith
• [EM] reply to venzke re utility, approval, range   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Rob Brown's "repair" of range voting   Warren Smith
• [EM] Rob Brown's "repair" of range voting   rob brown
• [EM] Rob Brown's "repair" of range voting   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Rob Brown's "repair" of range voting   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Rob Brown's "repair" of range voting   rob brown
• [EM] some questions about utility   Stephen Turner
• [EM] some questions about utility   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] some questions about utility   James Gilmour
• [EM] some questions about utility   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Strategy free method proposal   rob brown
• [EM] Strategy free method proposal   rob brown
• [EM] Strategy free method proposal   Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Strategy free method proposal   rob brown
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   rob brown
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] two "new" hybrid approval-ranking methods by Brams & Sanver   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] two "new" hybrid approval-ranking methods by Brams & Sanver   Chris Benham
• [EM] two "new" hybrid approval-ranking methods by Brams & Sanver   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Two approval ballot methods... (small error)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Two approval ballot methods using approval opposition   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Two approval ballot methods using approval opposition   Chris Benham
• [EM] Two approval ballot methods using approval opposition   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] two new hybrid approval-ranking methods by Brams & Sanver   Warren Smith
• [EM] two new hybrid approval-ranking methods by Brams & Sanver   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Uncontested elections   PROUT - Progressive Utilisation
• [EM] Uncontested elections   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Uncontested elections   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Updated article   rob brown
• [EM] Updated article   Jan Kok
• [EM] Updated article   rob brown
• [EM] Updated article   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Updated article   rob brown
• [EM] Upgrading wiki.electorama.com   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Upgrading wiki.electorama.com   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Voting puzzle page now available at CRV   Warren Smith
• [EM] Voting puzzle page now available at CRV   Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Voting puzzle page now available at CRV   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Voting puzzle page now available at CRV   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Why Utility is more important - reply to Venzke, Gilmour   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why Utility is more important than "transvestite Inversion Property" - reply to Venzke, Gilmour   Warren Smith
• [EM] Why Utility is more important than "transvestite Inversion Property" - reply to Venzke, Gilmour   James Gilmour
• [EM] yet MORE massive confusion by Venzke:   Warren Smith

Last message date: Fri Dec 30 16:40:08 PST 2005
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:32:32 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...