[EM] counting ballots
Paul Kislanko
kislanko at airmail.net
Wed Dec 14 17:10:53 PST 2005
Jobst already provided the correct answer, which is part of the mathematical
literature. No need to publish yours.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: election-methods-bounces at electorama.com
> [mailto:election-methods-bounces at electorama.com] On Behalf Of
> Warren Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 7:02 PM
> To: election-methods at electorama.com
> Subject: [EM] counting ballots
>
> >Kislanko:
> The number of full ranked ballots is just the number of
> permutations of N
> alternatives = N!
>
> If equal ranknigs are allowed, it's N! + 2^N - 1
>
> If truncation is allowed it is approximately N! * e
>
> And if both truncation AND equal rankings are allowed it's
> approximately N!
> * e + 2^N - 1
>
>
> --the statements containing "2^N" are false.
>
> The true answers are in one of the chapters of my (as yet unpublished)
> book. Anyhow, letting E(N) denote the answer, there are
> various direct and indirect
> expressions for E(N).
> E(N) = #ballots for N candidates with equal rankings allowed.
> Truncation forbidden.
> E(0)=E(1)=1, E(2)=3 E(3)=13 E(4)=75 E(5)=541
> Amazingly, E(N) is the nearest integer to
> N! / (2*ln(2)^(N+1)) when N=0,1,...,15,16
> but this is false when N=17. It is true asymptitically for N large.
>
> Generating function:
> sum E(N) * x^N / N! = 1/(2-exp(x))
> N>=0
>
>
>
> I also have the exact result if truncatio is allowed too, but
> it is messier.
> wds
> ----
> election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em
> for list info
>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list