[EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix

[rob brown]

On 12/2/05, Paul Kislanko <kislanko at airmail.net> wrote:
>
> The only thing I asked was for people who make logical or mathematical
> claims to prove them.
>
> No one wants to bother, so I don't care.
>

Paul, you made claims that Condorcet was flawed, but refused to "prove" or
even defend your complaints.  While maybe not a mathematical proof, I felt
that I put forward a strong argument that your main complaint was not
valid.  You replied with  "I don't have to support my argument".

I think you are expecting an awful lot to post broad attacks on Condorcet,
refuse to back them up when called on them, and then ask us to prove the
methods valid to your liking.

-rob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20051202/1751326d/attachment-0003.htm>