September 2001 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Sep 1 11:10:39 PDT 2001
Ending: Sun Sep 30 22:56:56 PDT 2001
Messages: 186

• CR pairwise   Forest Simmons
• CR pairwise   Roy
• [EM] Ranked Preferences   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Mr Simmons: provide the FBC definition please   Craig Carey
• [EM] Mr Simmons: provide the FBC definition please   Craig Carey
• [EM] Mr Simmons: provide the FBC definition please   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV is summable (a little)   Roy
• [EM] IRV is summable (a little)   Buddha Buck
• [EM] Re: IRV is summable (a little)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: IRV is summable (a little)   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Circular defeats [was Re: IRV is summable (a little)]   Bart Ingles
• Circular defeats [was Re: IRV is summable (a little)]   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: IRV is summable (a little)   Buddha Buck
• [EM] Fluffy the dog: rejection of Condorcet   Craig Carey
• [EM] Fluffy the dog: rejection of Condorcet   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Fluffy the dog: rejection of Condorcet   Craig Carey
• [EM] FBC (Favorite Betrayal Criterion) Definition   Forest Simmons
• [EM] FBC (Favorite Betrayal Criterion) Definition   Forest Simmons
• [EM] FBC (Favorite Betrayal Criterion) Definition   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Craig's posts   Roy One
• [EM] Craig's posts   Richard Moore
• [EM] Craig's posts   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Mr Ketchum: Rule on when 0 winners is best for 1 winner elections   Craig Carey
• [EM] Craig's posts   Richard Moore
• [EM] Craig's posts   Roy
• [EM] Craig's posts   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Craig's posts   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Fla. Rids Itself of Punch-Card Ballots   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] When 0 winners is best   Roy
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Forest Simmons
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Roy One
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Buddha Buck
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Richard Moore
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Forest Simmons
• Seven +/- Two   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Seven +/- Two   Forest Simmons
• Seven +/- Two   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Roy
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Richard Moore
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Roy
• [EM] Seven +/- Two   Forest Simmons
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Consistency; IFPP   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Richard Moore
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Forest Simmons
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Bart Ingles
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Dave's ranked-ballot concerns   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Buddha Buck
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Bart Ingles
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Richard Moore
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.)   Buddha Buck
• [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.)   Buddha Buck
• [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.)   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.)   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Chat on "A<B=C" & "=": to avoid infinitesimals & reject use of geometry   Craig Carey
• [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Bart Ingles
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Nomenclature   Bart Ingles
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Forest Simmons
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   heitzig at math.uni-hannover.de
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Correction (was: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences)   Bart Ingles
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Richard Moore
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Dave Ketchum
• CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Forest Simmons
• CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Richard Moore
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Blake Cretney
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Another 20 years of the EM list   Craig Carey
• [EM] Another 20 years of the EM list   Richard Moore
• [EM] Another 20 years of the EM list   Buddha Buck
• [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Richard Moore
• [EM] Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Forest Simmons
• CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences   Forest Simmons
• [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than a triangle   Craig Carey
• [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than a triangle   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Two new election books   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Multiple Attacks on the U.S.A.   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Multiple Attacks on the U.S.A.   donald at mich.com
• [EM] Multiple Attacks on the U.S.A.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Multiple Attacks on the U.S.A.   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy   Craig Layton
• [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy   Richard Moore
• [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy   Craig Layton
• [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy   Moe St. EverGreen
• [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy   Richard Moore
• [EM] IFPP for more than three candidates?   Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Factorising methods (Was: IFPP for more than three candidates?   Craig Carey
• [EM] IFPP for more than three candidates?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Fix of 1/4 quota 'Q' AV method (was: IFPP for more than three candidates?   Craig Carey
• [EM] IFPP for more than three candidates?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy   Bart Ingles
• Fluffy the Dog and group strategy   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy   Anthony Simmons
• [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy   Craig Layton
• [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy   Richard Moore
• IFPP and Schulze comments (re [EM] Craig's posts   Craig Carey
• IFPP and Schulze comments (re [EM] Craig's posts   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Participation axiom re 2nd preference alterations   Craig Carey
• [FairVoteOR] Why 3 and not 4? (fwd)   Forest Simmons
• Why 3 and not 4?   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Ramon Lull   Markus Schulze
• [EM] [FairVoteOR] Eugene (fwd)   Forest Simmons
• [EM] [FairVoteOR] Eugene (fwd)   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Eugene rejected 'IRV' option; vote-splitting in AV   Craig Carey
• [EM] Eugene rejected 'IRV' option; vote-splitting in AV   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Eugene rejected 'IRV' option; vote-splitting in AV   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Eugene rejected 'IRV' option; vote-splitting in AV   Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Could CR-style ballots help ballot measures pass?   Moe St. EverGreen
• Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums   Moe St. EverGreen
• Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums   Richard Moore
• Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums   Forest Simmons
• Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums   Richard Moore
• [EM] Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums   Forest Simmons
• [EM] two bit ratings (was seven +/- two)   Forest Simmons
• two bit ratings (was seven +/- two)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] two bit ratings   Forest Simmons
• [EM] two bit ratings   Richard Moore
• [EM] two bit ratings   Forest Simmons
• [EM] two bit ratings   Craig Layton
• [EM] two bit ratings   Forest Simmons
• [EM] two bit ratings   Craig Layton
• [EM] two bit ratings   Richard Moore
• [EM] two bit ratings   Forest Simmons
• [EM] two bit ratings   Richard Moore
• [EM] two bit ratings   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Sincere winners   Craig Carey
• two bit ratings   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• two bit ratings   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] two bit ratings   Forest Simmons
• [EM] two bit ratings   Buddha Buck
• two bit ratings   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Topics in Social Choice -- Book   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• election methods   Rob Lanphier
• election methods   Richard Moore
• [EM] Hello everybody!   heitzig at math.uni-hannover.de
• Challenges for Theoretical Computer Science (Re: [EM] Hello everybody!   Craig Carey
• [EM] Hello everybody!   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Dyadic Rated Pairs   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Dyadic Rated Pairs   Roy
• [EM] Dyadic Rated Pairs   Forest Simmons
• Dyadic Rated Pairs   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Dyadic Rated Pairs   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Dyadic Rated Pairs   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Method S92 and the new P4 rule   Craig Carey
• [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you]   Richard Moore
• [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you]   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you]   Richard Moore
• [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you]   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you]   Richard Moore
• [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you]   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than , a triangle   Forest Simmons
• [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than , a triangle   Buddha Buck
• [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than , a triangle   Buddha Buck
• [EM] Policy Options, Jul-Aug 2001 Election reform articles   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Yahoo polls   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Yahoo polls - 2nd try   Bart Ingles
• [EM] [Fwd: Possibly naive question on polarizing candidates]   Alexander Small
• [Fwd: Possibly naive question on polarizing candidates]   DEMOREP1 at aol.com

Last message date: Sun Sep 30 22:56:56 PDT 2001
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:30:32 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...