[EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you]

[Dave Ketchum]

I suspect Craig needs stronger reminding that the internet lets us, from
various countries and speaking different languages, get together in EM -
though the languages are similar enough that each of us can CLAIM to be
speaking English.

I expect most of us had no trouble recognizing the thought Richard was
expressing (fishing is a word I might use to express the thought). 
Craig thought he saw a different thought - happens - I sometimes have
trouble recognizing the thoughts in some of the words as Craig uses them.

On the other side, "Two levels" puzzles me - if I had more time for this
group I might have got this from context, but I could have been asking
the same question (e.g., this could have been tied to something for
which Craig and I cannot picture levels being involved).

On Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:45:12 -0700 Richard Moore wrote:
> 
> Time to bring back Mike's idea of a poll on list conduct?
> 
> Don't know why Craig keeps this up all the time.
> 
> Richard
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: No response was requested from you
> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:44:08 +1200
> From: Craig Carey <research at ijs.co.nz>
> To: Richard Moore <rmoore4 at home.com>
> CC: Forest Simmons <fsimmons at pcc.edu>
> References: <20010926105902.3bb77ce6.bcretney at postmark.net>
>      <5.1.0.14.2.20010927065801.035d93f0 at 202.89.128.27>
> 
> This is not response and it is not able to be understood by anybody,
> I am sure.
> 
> You selected the root-word troll which means to wait for sexual
> partners. Is it going to occur to you to not repeat the same error?.
> 
> I am CC-ing this to Mr Forest Simmons since I did not address the
> request to you. I read your message here, and it is plain to me that
> asking for exact information from you will be something unfulfilled.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/election-methods-list/message/7408
> 
> So far you have just indicated you want to demonstrate a disagreeable
> lack of clear thinking. The question is on the nature of the internal
> relevations that Mr Forest Simmons was writing on.
> 
> My view is that the quality of Mr Simmon's responses can be likely
> to increase. So long as I ask no question to you (Mr Moore) it is
> not appropriate for me to consider the meaning of why you failed to
> provide any answer while presenting a response as if doing that.
> 
> Although you tried to change the topic to be personal cliches as
> mismatching insults with facts.
> 
> At 01.09.26 17:54 -0700 Wednesday, Richard Moore wrote:
>  >Craig Carey wrote:
>  >
>  >> Please define "two levels".
>  >
>  >
>  >Trolling again, I see. Craig can't be as clueless as he
>  >pretends to be.
>  >
>  >"Two levels" is one more than a single level.
>  >
>  >Richard
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
> 
> E-mail: Craig Carey <research at ijs.co.nz>

-- 
 davek at clarityconnect.com    http://www.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
  Dave Ketchum    108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY  13827-1708    607-687-5026
             Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
                   If you want peace, work for justice.