May 2012 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue May 1 00:45:17 PDT 2012
Ending: Thu May 31 20:38:43 PDT 2012
Messages: 146

• [EM] "FBC vs Condorcet's Criterion"   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] "FBC vs Condorcet's Criterion"   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] "FBC vs Condorcet's Criterion"   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "FBC vs Condorcet's Criterion"   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] (Let's try that again) Re: Kristofer: Approval vs Condorcet, 4/28/12   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] ? about your reply to Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] [Urgent] Information about M. Schulze   Rémi
• [EM] [Urgent] Information about M. Schulze   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Addenda to "What will happen..." post   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Addenda to "What will happen..." post   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Addenda to "What will happen..." post   Juho Laatu
• [EM] an extra step for IRV (and some other methods?)   C.Benham
• [EM] an extra step for IRV (and some other methods?)   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Another reason why Greens won't vote Dem, due to previous count results.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Approval-Fill-In--Always an improvement, and an option in Approval.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Approval-Runoff   C.Benham
• [EM] Approval strategy: never approve challengers   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Approval strategy: never approve challengers   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Approval strategy: never approve challengers   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Articles for Democracy Chronicles   Richard Fobes
• [EM] A solution that wouldn't bring debate to Democracy Chronicles   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Borda pr   Ross
• [EM] C/D resistant Condorcet methods.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] C/D resistant Condorcet methods.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] CC, Co-operation/Defection, definitions of Approval and VoteFair   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Clarification and correction about u/a strategy   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Co-operation/defection in perspective   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Comments on a few things said by Richard & Robert, May 10, '12   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Completely different reasons for and purposes of method advocacy.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Concerns of KM & RF. Approval, Condorcet & ICT strategy. Reform schedule.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Concerns of KM & RF. Approval, Condorcet & ICT strategy. Reform schedule.   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Could we work on enactment-feasibility instead of jealous, self-serving infighting?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Democracy Chronicles, introductions - Michael Allan   Adrian Tawfik
• [EM] Election layering effect (or why election-method reform is important)   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Election layering effect (or why election-method reform is important)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Election layering effect (or why election-method reform is important)   Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] full-ranking SODA: FBC compliant   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] full-ranking SODA: FBC compliant   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Handcounts   Juho Laatu
• [EM] How would Condorcet himself have solved his paradox?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] I retract my praise of Approval-Fill-In. It spoils ICT's defection-resistance.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Juho, optimists.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho, optimists.   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kristofer, contd.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kristofer: Addenda   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kristofer: Approval vs Condorcet, 4/28/12   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Mike: Count issues - learn English   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] New popularization article   Rémi
• [EM] Ok, the subject here is a waste of time.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff   Richard Fobes
• [EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff   Adrian Tawfik
• [EM] Richard reply, 5/7/12   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Second (and higher)-order methods?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Sincere voting definition: falsifying instead of contradicting a preference   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Smith-Top   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Smith-Top   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] SODA terminology: opinions wanted.   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] SODA terminology: opinions wanted.   Andy Jennings
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] To Condorcetists:   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Two completely different kinds of voting reforms. ICT vs Condorcet.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Typo. Plurality strategy, not Approval strategy, is a difficult problem.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Typo in Condorcet's Criterion definition   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] u/a for criteria. u/a FBC. Voter's Choice. SSCS. Strong FBC.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] u/a for criteria. u/a FBC. Voter's Choice. SSCS. Strong FBC.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] u/a for criteria. u/a FBC. Voter's Choice. SSCS. Strong FBC.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] u/a for criteria. u/a FBC. Voter's Choice. SSCS. Strong FBC.   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Unusual request - $20 reward   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Unusual request - $20 reward   Fred Gohlke
• [EM] Unusual request - $20 reward   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?   Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?   Juho Laatu
• [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?   robert bristow-johnson

Last message date: Thu May 31 20:38:43 PDT 2012
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:35:45 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...