October 1999 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Oct 1 04:12:56 PDT 1999
Ending: Sat Oct 30 18:58:19 PDT 1999
Messages: 184

• [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   David Catchpole
• [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   Craig Carey
• [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   David Catchpole
• [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   David Catchpole
• [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   David Catchpole
• [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   David Catchpole
• [EM] 10/27 - David Catchpole and his STV/MMP hybrid   Donald E Davison
• [EM] 10/27 - David Catchpole and his STV/MMP hybrid   David Catchpole
• [EM] 10/28 - The Redemption of David Catchpole   Donald E Davison
• [EM] 10/30/99 - Comments on Schulze's example.   Donald E Davison
• [EM] 3 Choices   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] 3 Choices   Craig Carey
• [EM] 3 Choices   David Catchpole
• 3 Choices   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] `Democracy is a beautiful thing, except...'   Donald E Davison
• [EM] `Lowering the Numbers' is a major flaw of STV   Donald E Davison
• [EM] `Lowering the Numbers' is a major flaw of STV   David Catchpole
• [EM] An Election is not over until It's Over   Donald E Davison
• [EM] An Election is not over until It's Over   David Catchpole
• [EM] Apology for obsolete message re: The "problem" with circularity   Hugh R. Tobin
• [EM] A Reply to: Two New STV Features - New to Me   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Bart questions Ideal Condition of no exhausted ballots   Donald E Davison
• Clarification Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   David Catchpole
• [EM] Cumulative and Limited Voting   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Cumulative and Limited Voting   Bart Ingles
• [EM] David Catchpole's Droop Quota [???]   Donald E Davison
• [EM] David Catchpole's Droop Quota [???]   David Catchpole
• [EM] David Catchpole and his STV/MMP hybrid   Donald E Davison
• [EM] David Catchpole and his STV/MMP hybrid   David Catchpole
• [EM] Direct Democracy via Judges and/or Juries   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Direct Link Between Voters and MPs   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Direct Link Between Voters and MPs   Wiseman, Julian
• [EM] Direct Link Between Voters and MPs   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Direct Link Between Voters and MPs   Wiseman, Julian
• [EM] Direct Link Between Voters and MPs   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Drawing P.R. Districts   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Tom Round
• [EM] Re: Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Craig Carey
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   David Catchpole
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Craig Carey
• [EM] Re: Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Craig Carey
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Craig Carey
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Craig Carey
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule????? [2]   Tom Round
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule????? [2]   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Droop fails the Markus Schulze Rule????? [2]   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Entrenching PR in the Constitution   Crabb, Deane (PIRSA)
• [EM] Entrenching PR in the Constitution   David Catchpole
• [EM] Entrenching PR in the Constitution   David Catchpole
• Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   David Catchpole
• Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   Craig Carey
• Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   David Catchpole
• Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   Craig Carey
• Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   Craig Carey
• Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   David Catchpole
• Erratum Re: [EM] (P1) and monotonicity for single-winner election systems and Condorcet.   David Catchpole
• [EM] ERSC/IPSA   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] FWD - Reply to DD via Judges and Juries   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Group Model Bylaws, 12 Oct 1999   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Hare, Droop and MEP   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Hare, Droop and MEP   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] How to Draw Gerrymander Plans   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] IIA Theory   Craig Carey
• [EM] IIA Theory   David Catchpole
• [EM] IIA Theory   David Catchpole
• [EM] IIA Theory   Craig Carey
• [EM] IIA Theory   David Catchpole
• [EM] IIA Theory   Craig Carey
• [EM] IIA Theory   Markus Schulze
• [EM] IIA Theory   Craig Carey
• [EM] IIA Theory   David Catchpole
• [EM] IIA Theory   David Catchpole
• [EM] IIA Theory   David Catchpole
• [EM] IIA Theory   Markus Schulze
• [EM] IIA Theory   Craig Carey
• [EM] Re: IIA Theory   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: IIA Theory   Craig Carey
• [EM] Re: IIA Theory   Craig Carey
• IIA Theory   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] IIA Theory   David Catchpole
• [EM] Re: IIA Theory   David Catchpole
• [EM] Re: IIA Theory   Tom Round
• IIA Theory   Bart Ingles
• [EM] IIA Theory   Craig Carey
• [EM] IIA Theory   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: IIA Theory   David Catchpole
• [EM] IIA Theory   David Catchpole
• [EM] IIA Theory   David Catchpole
• [EM] Maybe a new thread is in order ...   Craig Carey
• [EM] Maybe a new thread is in order ...   David Catchpole
• [EM] Maybe a new thread is in order: Cross-Tasman Catfight   David Catchpole
• [EM] Meek style STV - Part One of Two   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Meek style STV - Part One of Two   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Meek style STV - Part One of Two   David Catchpole
• [EM] Meek style STV - Part One of Two   Craig Carey
• [EM] Meek style STV - Part One of Two   Craig Carey
• [EM] Meek style STV - Part One of Two   Craig Carey
• [EM] Need for proportional representation   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: Need for proportional representation   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Need for proportional representation   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: Need for proportional representation   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Northern Ireland - more comments   Donald E Davison
• [EM] NZ MMP page/glossary   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] NZ MMP page/glossary   Blake Cretney
• [EM] NZ voters urged to back majority, one-party rule   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] October Update - from New Democracy   Donald E Davison
• [EM] ONTARIO 1999 MINORITY RULE SUMMARY DATA   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Ontario June 3, 1999 Summary Gerrymander Election Results   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Parliamentary points of order   Tom Round
• [EM] Population per seat chart   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Preferential voting and non-monotonicity   Tom Round
• [EM] Proportional means equal portions of the whole.   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Proportional means equal portions of the whole.   Tom Round
• [EM] Re: Proportional means equal portions of the whole.   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Proportional means equal portions of the whole.   David Catchpole
• [EM] Re: Proportional means equal portions of the whole.   David Catchpole
• [EM] Proportional means equal portions of the whole.   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: Proportional means equal portions of the whole.   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Proportional preferential voting   David Catchpole
• [EM] Proportional preferential voting   David Catchpole
• [EM] Proportional preferential voting   David Catchpole
• [EM] Proportional preferential voting   Wiseman, Julian
• [EM] Proportional preferential voting   David Catchpole
• [EM] Proportional Representation and the Droop Quota   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Proxy Voting   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole   Blake Cretney
• [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole   David Catchpole
• [EM] Replies to Craig Carey and David Catchpole   Craig Carey
• [EM] Robert Winters quotation on Droop   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Robert Winters quotation on Droop   SibArn at aol.com
• [EM] Robert Winters quotation on Droop   David Catchpole
• [EM] Robert Winters quotation on Droop   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Senators Want Nomination Changes   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Simple P.R. method   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Simple PR method   Crabb, Deane (PIRSA)
• [EM] RE: Simple PR method   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] SNTV and Bottoms Up and Lowering the Numbers   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Some are missing the point of the ballot `cockup'   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Some are missing the point of the ballot `cockup'   Crabb, Deane (PIRSA)
• [EM] Some are missing the point of the ballot `cockup'   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: Some are missing the point of the ballot `cockup'   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers   Craig Carey
• [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers   David Catchpole
• [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers   Craig Carey
• [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers   David Catchpole
• [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers   Bart Ingles
• [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers   Bart Ingles
• [EM] STV and having quotas to eliminate losers   Craig Carey
• STV in NSW   David Catchpole
• [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.   Donald E Davison
• [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.   Tom Round
• [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.   Craig Carey
• [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.   David Catchpole
• [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.   David Catchpole
• [EM] STV is suppose to be a PR method.   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: STV is suppose to be a PR method.   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: STV is suppose to be a PR method.   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• The "problem" with circularity (was Re: Reply to Blake Cretney)   Hugh R. Tobin
• [EM] The Last Temptation of David Catchpole- rated R   David Catchpole
• [EM] Tom Round's `yesterday' post is lost   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Tom Round's `yesterday' post is lost   Tom Round
• [EM] Tom said: "It's cheating to deem the votes..."   Donald E Davison
• [EM] TV Voting   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Update on Mike Ossipoff   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Voting Demorep's proxies both yes and no, in proportion to district.   Donald E Davison
• [EM] What is a wasted vote in a STV election??   Donald E Davison
• What is a wasted vote in a STV election??   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] What is a wasted vote in a STV election??   pct0039 at wiz.connected.net.nz
• [EM] Why the Droop Quota is wrong   Donald E Davison
• [EM] Why the Droop Quota is wrong   David Catchpole
• [EM] Why the Droop Quota is wrong   Crabb, Deane (PIRSA)
• [EM] Winning the Reform Party's Nomination Is Not Simple   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] YES/Number votes election method- legal language - 7 Oct 1999   DEMOREP1 at aol.com

Last message date: Sat Oct 30 18:58:19 PDT 1999
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:30:01 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...