May 2000 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon May 1 19:09:03 PDT 2000
Ending: Wed May 31 23:32:36 PDT 2000
Messages: 123

• [EM] wrote to Cthulhu address about Condorcet too.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Question about complete clone independence   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Question about complete clone independence   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Question about complete clone independence   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Probabilistic criteria. Participation & no-show.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Participation & no-show?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Probabilistic criteria. Participation & no-show.   Markus Schulze
• Probabilistic criteria (was Re: [EM] Probabilistic criteria. Participation & no-show.)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Participation & SARC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Participation & SARC   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Dissimilar tie-breaker   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Defense// voting method filter   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Probabilistic criteria. Participation & no-show.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Fwd: Re: Participation & SARC (was Re: [EM] Probabilistic criteria. Participation & no-show.)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV & Participation clarification   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Participation & SARC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Errata: typos in Dissimilar   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Participation IRV badexample   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Participation & SARC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] About the ambiguity in Dissimilar   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Question about complete clone independence   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] brief insincerity addendum   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Computer Voting Vendors   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Participation & SARC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Participation & SARC   Markus Schulze
• Probabilistic criteria (was Re: [EM] Participation & SARC)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Participation & SARC   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Participation & SARC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] miswording in claim #2   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Participation & SARC   David Catchpole
• [EM] Equivalent definition of clone independence; more on similarity   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Participation & SARC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Participation & SARC   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Participation & SARC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Test of maillist handling of html attachment   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Test of maillist handling of html attachment   David Catchpole
• [EM] Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] vulnerability to compromise?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] vulnerability to compromise?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] vulnerability to compromise?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] vulnerability to compromise?   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   Steve Eppley
• IBCM monotonicity, Schulze example (was Re: [EM] Tideman and GMC)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   Markus Schulze
• Participation & SARC   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• vulnerability to compromise?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Cyclic method comparisons   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Participation & SARC   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] vulnerability to compromise?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] vulnerability to compromise?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Participation & SARC   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] vulnerability to compromise?   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Antisocial behavior   Steve Eppley
• "Indirect" strategy (was Re: [EM] vulnerability to compromise?)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Tideman and GMC   Markus Schulze
• Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Idea I had- "The Psephocrina"   David Catchpole
• vulnerability to compromise?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Idea I had- "The Psephocrina"   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Idea I had- "The Psephocrina"   David Catchpole
• Participation & SARC   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Idea I had- "The Psephocrina"   Bart Ingles
• Participation & SARC   Bart Ingles
• [EM] vulnerability to compromise?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Antisocial behavior   Markus Schulze
• vulnerability to compromise?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• "Indirect" strategy (was Re: [EM] vulnerability to compromise?)   Markus Schulze
• Participation & SARC   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] vulnerability to compromise?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Antisocial behavior   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• vulnerability to compromise?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Antisocial behavior   Markus Schulze
• vulnerability to compromise?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Idea I had- "The Psephocrina"   David Catchpole
• [EM] Nash- the Movie.   David Catchpole
• vulnerability to compromise?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] FWD - The search for perfect STV, with ties allowed   Venus Greenhouse
• vulnerability to compromise?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Losing with 65% in the Approval Vote   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Losing with 65% in the Approval Vote   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Losing with 65% in the Approval Vote   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Method definitions   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze   Norman Petry
• [EM] tied clones retraction   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Method definitions   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Idea I had- "The Psephocrina"   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Approval Vote: 99% isn't enough   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Approval Vote: 99% isn't enough   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval Vote: 99% isn't enough   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Idea I had- "The Psephocrina"   David Catchpole
• [EM] Approval Vote: 99% isn't enough   David Catchpole
• [EM] Ooh... I think he's riled.   David Catchpole
• [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Approval Vote: The unfairness of being dead   Craig Carey
• Ooh... I think he's riled. (fwd)   David Catchpole
• Approval Vote: The unfairness of being dead   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Approval Vote: The unfairness of being dead   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Papers can have the last preference filled   Craig Carey
• [EM] Approval Vote: The unfairness of being dead .. to Schulze   Craig Carey
• [EM] Papers can have the last preference filled   Craig Carey
• Approval Vote: The unfairness of being dead   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Papers can have the last preference filled   David Catchpole

Last message date: Wed May 31 23:32:36 PDT 2000
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:30:09 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...