"Indirect" strategy (was Re: [EM] vulnerability to compromise?)

[Markus Schulze]

Dear Steve,

you wrote (16 May 2000):
> Of course it's been pointed out that, with both Schulze &
> Tideman, it's sometimes possible to make A win instead of B
> by insincerely ranking C over D.

Sssh! Steve would prefer we believe such an "indirect" 
strategy can be used in Schulze (a.k.a. SD) but not in
Tideman.

Markus Schulze