December 2003 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Dec 1 16:15:30 PST 2003
Ending: Wed Dec 31 13:39:01 PST 2003
Messages: 162

• [EM] "Consequences of Reversing Preferences"   Steve Barney
• [EM] "Consequences of Reversing Preferences"   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Weak FBC and equal-ranking-allowed IRV   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Weak FBC and equal-ranking-allowed IRV   Chris Benham
• [EM] NI: making sense of the maths   David GLAUDE
• [EM] NI: making sense of the maths   James Gilmour
• [EM] [Fwd: Weak FBC and equal-ranking-allowed IRV]   Chris Benham
• [EM] Another kind of approval equilibrium   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Another kind of approval equilibrium   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Automated CR Strategy   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Automated CR Strategy   Craig Carey
• [EM] Automated CR Strategy   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Automated CR Strategy   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Verifiable secure voting using dual half pixel receipts   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] Appeal for better weblog polling (Electorama)   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #374 - 1 msg   Ken Johnson
• [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #374 - 1 msg   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] Review of Reversing preference lists paper by Mr Barney, Mr D. G. Saari   Craig Carey
• [EM] Fwd: [E-voting] STV and e-voting incompatible   David GLAUDE
• [EM] Craig Carey's recent posts.   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] FWD: An urgent plea for your assistance -- this is NOT spam!   Steve Barney
• [EM] FWD: An urgent plea for your assistance -- this is NOT spam!   Eron Lloyd
• [EM] Voting Matters, Issue 17   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Voting Matters, Issue 17   Markus Schulze
• [EM] An urgent plea for your assistance -- this is NOT spam!]   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] An urgent plea for your assistance -- this is NOT spam!]   Forest Simmons
• [EM] An urgent plea for your assistance -- this is NOT spam!]   David GLAUDE
• [EM] An urgent plea for your assistance -- this is NOT spam!]   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] a strategic problem and possible remedy for Condorcet-efficient voting methods   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Floyd Algorithm?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Floyd Algorithm?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: Floyd algorithm?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Floyd algorithm?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Re: Floyd algorithm?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Floyd algorithm?   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Floyd algorithm? - peace   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Floyd algorithm? - peace   David GLAUDE
• [EM] Floyd algorithm? - peace   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Floyd algorithm? - peace   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] BeatpathWinner Algorithm   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] BeatpathWinner Algorithm   Markus Schulze
• [EM] BeatpathWinner Algorithm   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Rejecting the Schulze preferential voting method: a time for reform   Craig Carey
• [EM] Rejecting the Schulze preferential voting method: a time for reform   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Two Paramount Criteria   Forest Simmons
• [EM] Two Paramount Criteria   Craig Carey
• [EM] Two Paramount Criteria   Markus Schulze
• The German loser (Re: [EM] Two Paramount Criteria   Craig Carey
• The German loser (Re: [EM] Two Paramount Criteria   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Markus's debate about what I allegedly said (Who but Markus cares?)   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus's debate about what I allegedly said (Who but Markus cares?)   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Reply to Ernie   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply to Ernie   Rob Speer
• [EM] Reply to Ernie   Diana Galletly
• [EM] Reply to Ernie   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] Reply to Ernie   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] What is this software MIKE is working on...   David GLAUDE
• [EM] unsuscribe   Martin
• [EM] Floyd-Warshall algorithm   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Floyd-Warshall algorithm - variations   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Floyd-Warshall algorithm - variations   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Floyd-Warshall algorithm - variations   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Floyd-Warshall algorithm - variations   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Floyd-Warshall algorithm - variations   stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
• [EM] Floyd-Warshall algorithm - variations   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Floyd-Warshall algorithm - variations   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Floyd-Warshall algorithm - variations   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Floyd-Warshall algorithm - variations   Ernest Prabhakar
• [EM] Floyd-Warshall algorithm - variations   Markus Schulze
• [EM] RE: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #388 - 7 msgs   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #388 - 7 msgs   Markus Schulze
• [EM] RE: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #388 - 7 msgs   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #388 - 7 msgs   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Reply to Matt   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply to Matt   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply to Matt   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Ernie: What started the discussion about BeatpathWinner algorithms   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply to Rob Speer   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus reply, 12/20/03   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Markus reply, 12/20/03   Markus Schulze
• [EM] 2nd reply to Markus on 12/20/03   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 2nd Matt reply--12/20/03   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 2nd Matt reply--12/20/03   Diana Galletly
• [EM] 2nd Matt reply--12/20/03   Markus Schulze
• [EM] 2nd Matt reply--12/20/03   Craig Carey
• [EM] 2nd Matt reply--12/20/03   Diana Galletly
• [EM] 2nd Matt reply--12/20/03   Rob Brown
• [EM] 2nd Matt reply--12/20/03   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] 2nd Matt reply--12/20/03   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Compromise for speed and obvious validity   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] (no subject)   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] The request for Steve's count proposal   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The Floyd Algorithm   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] EM] What is this software MIKE is working on...   matt at tidalwave.net
• [EM] "Paper" that mentions Kemeny Median   Gervase Lam
• [EM] Optional Later-no-harm AER   Chris Benham
• Election Methods List and lying vs justice (Re: [EM] Optional Later-no-harm AER   Craig Carey
• [EM] Earlier-no-harm   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Earlier-no-harm   Anthony Duff
• [EM] Earlier-no-harm   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Earlier-no-harm   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Earlier-no-harm   Markus Schulze
• [EM] MinMax definition, Tideman properties   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MinMax definition, Tideman properties   Markus Schulze
• [EM] MinMax definition, Tideman properties   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Later-no-harm question   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Later-no-harm question   Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Later-no-harm question   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: Later-no-harm question   Chris Benham
• [EM] Proof that Floyd's works in one pass?   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Actual quotes for Markus   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Actual quotes for Markus   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Actual quotes for Markus   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Matt reply, 12/21/03   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Yet more Markus   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Typo in "Proof that Floyd finishes in 1 pass?"   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Typo in "Proof that Floyd finishes in 1 pass?"   Rob Speer
• [EM] Winning-votes vs margins as a measure of defeat-strength   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Later-no-harm definition   Chris Benham
• [EM] Later-no-harm definition   Bart Ingles
• [EM] Later-no-harm definition   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Two Questions for Craig Carey   Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] SSD is not BeatpathWinner   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] SSD is not BeatpathWinner   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet for public proposals   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Election methods Wiki   Bjarke Dahl Ebert
• [EM] Election methods Wiki   Rob Speer
• [EM] Correctness of Floyd-Warshall for beatpaths   Andrew Myers
• [EM] Later-no-harm, "Earlier-no-harm"   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Later-no-harm, "Earlier-no-harm"   Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Later-no-harm, "Earlier-no-harm"   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Markus: Take it to individual e-mail or drop it. Don't post about it.   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] RE: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #397 - 6 msgs   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #397 - 6 msgs   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Retraction about IRV, Brams, and Later-No-Harm   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV fails Later-No-Harm   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dan W-J; IRV is 2nd best (=worst); CVD tells Maryland 'no research ever'   Craig Carey
• [EM] Dan W-J; IRV is 2nd best (=worst); CVD tells Maryland 'no research ever'   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Dan W-J; IRV is 2nd best (=worst); CVD tells Maryland 'no research ever'   Craig Carey
• [EM] Dan W-J; IRV is 2nd best (=worst); CVD tells Maryland 'no research ever'   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Diana asked about Craig Carey:   Donald Davison
• [EM] Ranked Pairs Description   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Ranked Pairs Description   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Ranked Pairs Description   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Ranked Pairs Description   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Ranked Pairs Description   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Ranked Pairs Description   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Ranked Pairs Description   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Oh...   Eric Gorr
• [EM] RE: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #401 - 1 msg   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Ranked Pairs Description   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Ranked Pairs Description   Eric Gorr
• [EM] Reply to James Green-Armytage--Condorcet strategy   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Anti-reversal enhancements for Condorcet   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] LNH, Mono-Add-Top, etc   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] "DOC," A method meeting ENHarm and Majority   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Craig's Folly and Dan's Folly are two peas in a pod:   Donald Davison
• [EM] Defensive truncation in wv Condorcet   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Defensive truncation in wv Condorcet   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #405 - 5 msgs   Richard Moore
• [EM] "MinMax" can mean almost anything   MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] "MinMax" can mean almost anything   Kevin Venzke

Last message date: Wed Dec 31 13:39:01 PST 2003
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:31:17 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...