anthony_duff at yahoo.com.au
Mon Dec 29 03:11:02 PST 2003
--- Kevin Venzke <stepjak at yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Anthony Duff suggested that MinMax meets Later-no-harm. I don't
> that's correct, though.
I made the suggestion on the basis of:
(Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 17:53:42 -0800)
where Markus Schulze wrote"
"In another paper, Woodall proves that no election method can
simultaneously meet later-no-harm, later-no-help, monotonicity,
and mutual majority. Therefore, the fact that Minimax(pairwise
opposition) violates mutual majority in such a drastic manner
can be considered a consequence of the fact that it meets
later-no-harm, later-no-help, and monotonicity."
http://personals.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Personals
New people, new possibilities. FREE for a limited time.
More information about the Election-Methods