[EM] Earlier-no-harm

[Anthony Duff]

 --- Kevin Venzke <stepjak at yahoo.fr> wrote: 

> 
> Anthony Duff suggested that MinMax meets Later-no-harm.  I don't
> think
> that's correct, though.

I made the suggestion on the basis of:
http://www.mail-archive.com/election-methods-electorama.com@lists.electorama.com/msg00018.html
(Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 17:53:42 -0800)

where Markus Schulze wrote"
"In another paper, Woodall proves that no election method can
simultaneously meet later-no-harm, later-no-help, monotonicity,
and mutual majority. Therefore, the fact that Minimax(pairwise
opposition) violates mutual majority in such a drastic manner
can be considered a consequence of the fact that it meets
later-no-harm, later-no-help, and monotonicity."



http://personals.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Personals
New people, new possibilities. FREE for a limited time.