[EM] Later-no-harm question

Stephane Rouillon stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
Sun Dec 21 13:40:08 PST 2003


Finally, someone with a serious subject.

I have no idea of what is an exact definition of the Later-no-harm criteria.
So please tell me, so I can help you in your search.

You have owned it.

Steph

Kevin Venzke a écrit :

> Does anyone have any idea if for the following ballots:
>
> 11 C>A
> 7 A
> 9 B
> 10 D>B
>
> an election method which meets Later-no-harm can elect B?
> If not, or probably not, what reasons can you see?
>
> I know of two methods which meet later-no-harm (IRV and Woodall's
> Descending Solid Coalitions) and they both pick C.
>
> Kevin Venzke
> stepjak at yahoo.fr
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
> Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
> ----
> Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info




More information about the Election-Methods mailing list