[EM] Compromise for speed and obvious validity
MIKE OSSIPOFF
nkklrp at hotmail.com
Sun Dec 21 00:28:01 PST 2003
Sure, that compromise would be ok: The indices in the testing and
re-assigning core of the loop
could be re-ordered so as to make more passes unnecessary, so that only 2
passes would be made. If the 2nd pass makes no changes, there's no 3rd
pass. And the fact that the algorithm obviously repeats till no stonger
beatpaths can be found between any ordered candidate pairs means that it
still has the same obvious validity that it had before.
Mike Ossipoff
_________________________________________________________________
Check your PC for viruses with the FREE McAfee online computer scan.
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list