March 1996 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Mar 1 00:53:01 PST 1996
Ending: Sun Mar 31 22:30:29 PST 1996
Messages: 147

• [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Lucien Saumur
• [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Lucien Saumur
• [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Matthew Shugart
• [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Steve Eppley
• [EM] [SW] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Steve Eppley
• [EM] No Objection to NOTB or disapproval count   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] No Objection to NOTB or disapproval count   Steve Eppley
• [EM] [SW] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] [SW] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Steve Eppley
• [EM] [SW] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] reply to earlier letter re: H,M,S example   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] reply to earlier letter re: H,M,S example   Steve Eppley
• [EM] [SW] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Defects in various election systems   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Multiple Same Choices   Lucien Saumur
• [EM] Multiple Same Choices   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Multiple Same Choices   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Multiple Same Choices   Lucien Saumur
• [EM] Multiple Same Choices   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Multiple Same Choices   Lucien Saumur
• [EM] Multiple Same Choices   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Multiple Same Choices   Lucien Saumur
• [EM] Same subject-line, different messages   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Condorcet tie-breaking (was Re: Multiple Same Choices)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Pairwise winner of the 2 least-beaten   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Re: Pairwise winner of the 2 least-beaten   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: Pairwise winner of the 2 least-beaten   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Re: Pairwise winner of the 2 least-beaten   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: Pairwise winner of the 2 least-beaten   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Replies to Saumur   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Replies to Saumur   Lucien Saumur
• [EM] Replies to Saumur   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Replies to Saumur   Lucien Saumur
• [EM] Replies to Saumur   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Replies to Saumur   Lucien Saumur
• [EM] Dumbed down ballots (was Re: No Objection to NOTB or disapproval   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Structured messages; Electoral standards (was Re: Where to conve   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Structured messages; Electoral standards (was Re: Where to conve   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Structured messages; Electoral standards (was Re:   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Collective ordering of SW standards   Mike Ossipoff
• Loaned election'puters (was Re: [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Exampl   Steve Eppley
• Loaned election'puters (was Re: [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Exampl   Lucien Saumur
• [EM] Meaning of ballot truncation (was Re: Replies to Saumur)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Meaning of ballot truncation (was Re: Replies to Saumur)   Lucien Saumur
• [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle Example Again Reply   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Replying to Demorep   Mike Ossipoff
• Loaned election'puters (was Re: [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Midd   Steve Eppley
• [EM] {Process} Collective ordering of SW standards   Steve Eppley
• [EM] {Process} Collective ordering of SW standards   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] {Process} Collective ordering of SW standards   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] NOTB   Matthew Shugart
• [EM] NOTB   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Meaning of ballot truncation (was Re: Replies to Saumu   Steve Eppley
• SW simplicity & decisiveness (was Re: [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle   Steve Eppley
• SW simplicity & decisiveness (was Re: [EM] Hitler-Stalin-Middle   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Single Winner math basics   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Single Winner math basics   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Equivalent proposals (reply to Demorep)   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Electoral standards   Wynott at aol.com
• [EM] Electoral standards   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Electoral standards   Wynott at aol.com
• Another standard? (was Re: [EM] Equivalent proposals (reply to D   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: SW simplicity & decisiveness (was Re: Hitler-Stalin-Mi   Steve Eppley
• [EM] <<process>> Periodic FAQ on document process   Steve Eppley
• [EM] <process> Brief replies   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] <process> Brief replies   Steve Eppley
• [EM] <process> Brief replies   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Disapproval & NOTB. Fairness to Demorep.   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] <<process>> Periodic FAQ on document process   Wynott at aol.com
• No subject   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] More Demorep replies   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Single Winner math basics more   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Arguments against disapproval. Demorep reply re: notation.   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] <<process>> Collective ordering of SW standards   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Disapproval risks reform movement (was Re: Brief replies)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] <process> Collective ordering of SW standards   Steve Eppley
• [EM] <process> Collective ordering of SW standards   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Format of ranked ballot examples (was Re: More Demorep replies)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] standard "Reward Organizers"? (was Re: Periodic FAQ on document   Steve Eppley
• [EM] standard "Reward Organizers"? (was Re: Periodic FAQ on document   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Single Winner Basics, Part 3   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Not feasible to keep rebutting same objections   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Arguments against disapproval. Demorep1 reply   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] No Subject correction   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] More Demorep replies-Demorep1 reply   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] <<process>> Multiple-option initiatives   Wynott at aol.com
• [EM] Multiple-option initiatives   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Multiple-option initiatives   Wynott at aol.com
• [EM] Multiple-option initiatives   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Multiple-option initiatives   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Multiple-option initiatives   Matthew Shugart
• [EM] Multiple-option initiatives   Matthew Shugart
• [EM] Shugart's disclosure   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Multiple-option initiatives   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Multiple-option initiatives   Helena Catt
• [EM] Condorcet tie breakers   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] MSC voter instructions   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] req to Matthew: definitions of standards   Steve Eppley
• [EM] decisiveness & simplicity   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] req to Matthew: definitions of standards   Steve Eppley
• [EM] req to Matthew: definitions of standards   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Mail Problems (fwd)   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] We still aren't on listproc   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] multiseat pairwise?   Steve Eppley
• [EM] multiseat pairwise?   Steve Eppley
• [EM] multiseat pairwise?   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Re: more on mpv vs. pairwise   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] standard: right to have preferences counted   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] standard: right to have preferences counted   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Average Percentage Method   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Direct Democracy web pages   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Reply to Examples & Criticisms   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] a typo   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Re: [ER] Re: Explaining pairwise   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] My (& your) standards & Condorcet   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Our Standards & Condorcet contd.   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] brief addendum   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Glossary 3/25/96   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Shugart's disclosure circa 3/13/96   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Points Voting Method   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Single Winner Methods Pros and Cons   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] Single Winner Methods Pros and Cons   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Single Winner Methods Pros and Cons   Bruce Anderson
• [EM] Single Winner Methods Pros and Cons   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Single Winner Methods Pros and Cons   Bruce Anderson
• [EM] search.com search engine   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] electing quotas   Helena Catt
• [EM] electing quotas   Ed Still
• [EM] electing quotas   Steve Eppley
• [EM] "Spokane" method   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] "Spokane" method   Bruce Anderson
• [EM] "Spokane" method   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] "Spokane" method   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] "Spokane" method   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Internet host for EM documents (was Re: [EM] "Spokane" method)   Steve Eppley
• [EM] Mutual Majority Criterion   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] MM wording correction   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] Condorcet Tie Breaker Instant Runoffs   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• [EM] (Fwd) Problem with Condorcet?   Steve Eppley
• [EM] (Fwd) Problem with Condorcet?   Rob Lanphier
• [EM] (Fwd) STV and truncation   Steve Eppley
• [EM] (Fwd) STV and truncation   Rob Lanphier

Last message date: Sun Mar 31 22:30:29 PST 1996
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:29:25 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...