[EM] <process> Brief replies

DEMOREP1 at aol.com DEMOREP1 at aol.com
Wed Mar 6 15:56:59 PST 1996

Subj:  [EM] <process> Brief replies
Date:  Wed, Mar 6, 1996 3:50 AM EDT
dfb at bbs.cruzio.com wrote:

<Because I consider a multicandidate race a relative choice <anyway, it never
occurred to me to consider absolute <disapproval.  Majority rule could have 2

<3a) Not electing someone to whom a majority prefers someone else

<3b) Not electing someone whom a majority disapprove <absolutely
<   (though that's more difficult to define, and more difficult
<     for the voter to judge)

Something similar with me. It was because of a lack of considering absolute
disapproval that I was earlier advocating Approval Voting over plain

However with Multiple Same Choices (equal to a multiple mixture of
Disapproval, Approval and Condorcet) every voter gets something (except
possibly/probably and critically a majority-of-all-voters (MOAV) winner).

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list