[EM] <process> Brief replies

[DEMOREP1 at aol.com]

In 
Subj:  [EM] <process> Brief replies
Date:  Wed, Mar 6, 1996 3:50 AM EDT
dfb at bbs.cruzio.com wrote:

<Because I consider a multicandidate race a relative choice <anyway, it never
occurred to me to consider absolute <disapproval.  Majority rule could have 2
subheadings:

<3a) Not electing someone to whom a majority prefers someone else

<3b) Not electing someone whom a majority disapprove <absolutely
<   (though that's more difficult to define, and more difficult
<     for the voter to judge)

Something similar with me. It was because of a lack of considering absolute
disapproval that I was earlier advocating Approval Voting over plain
Condorcet. 

However with Multiple Same Choices (equal to a multiple mixture of
Disapproval, Approval and Condorcet) every voter gets something (except
possibly/probably and critically a majority-of-all-voters (MOAV) winner).