[EM] Disapproval risks reform movement (was Re: Brief replies)

[Steve Eppley]

Mike O. argued (in a message labelled process):
>But it's a serious fact that with our current lineups, it might be
>difficult to elect anyone if disapproval can disqualify candidates.
>The problem is that single-winner reform could then be blamed for the
>chaos resulting from not having a President, and people might react
>by throwing out the single-winner reform altogether, which would be
>worse than having a disapproved President--if the lineup is really so
>bad that a widely disapproved candidate wins.

con {{Decisiveness {{Disapproval {{NOTB {{chaos
con {{Decisiveness {{Disapproval {{NOTB {{undermine reform movement

--Steve