September 2007 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Sep 1 21:45:21 PDT 2007
Ending: Sat Sep 29 16:57:39 PDT 2007
Messages: 86

• [Election-Methods] Challenge: Elect the compromise when there'reonly 2 factions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] Methods to prevent ghost voting?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] Challenge: Elect the compromise when there'reonly 2 factions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] Challenge: Elect the compromise when there'reonly 2 factions   Jobst Heitzig
• [Election-Methods] elect the compromise   Forest W Simmons
• [Election-Methods] elect the compromise   Jobst Heitzig
• [Election-Methods] MMPO: the best 'transitional' method?   Diego Renato
• [Election-Methods] Important Decision on Voting Machines This Week - Urge House to Vote "Yes" on HR811   Kathy Dopp
• [Election-Methods] MMPO: the best 'transitional' method?   Dave Ketchum
• [Election-Methods] "Later no harm" confusion   Warren Smith
• [Election-Methods] How does the Schulze Method and Ranking Pairs work?   John Wong
• [Election-Methods] How does the Schulze Method and Ranking Pairs work?   Chris Benham
• [Election-Methods] RE : FW: How does the Schulze Method and Ranking Pairs work?   Kevin Venzke
• [Election-Methods] Challenge: Elect the compromise when there'reonly 2 factions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] elect the compromise   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] MMPO: the best 'transitional' method?   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] Challenge: Elect the compromise when there'reonly 2 factions   Jobst Heitzig
• [Election-Methods] How does the Schulze Method and Ranking Pairs work?   seppley at alumni.caltech.edu
• [Election-Methods] Challenge: Elect the compromise when there'reonly 2 factions   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] Challenge: Elect the compromise when there'reonly 2 factions   Howard Swerdfeger
• [Election-Methods] "Later no harm" confusion   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] elect the compromise   Forest W Simmons
• [Election-Methods] elect the compromise   Jobst Heitzig
• [Election-Methods] elect the compromise   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] [EM] Visualizations of Plurality, Hare, Approval, and Condorcet   Gervase Lam
• [Election-Methods] elect the compromise   raphfrk at netscape.net
• [Election-Methods] How is the Nanson and/or Baldwin non-monotonic?   John Wong
• [Election-Methods] RE : How is the Nanson and/or Baldwin non-monotonic?   Kevin Venzke
• [Election-Methods] How is the Nanson and/or Baldwinnon-monotonic?   John Wong
• [Election-Methods] How is the Nanson and/or Baldwin non-monotonic?   John Wong
• [Election-Methods] How is the Nanson and/or Baldwin non-monotonic?   Chris Benham
• [Election-Methods] Measuring power in a multi winner election   Howard Swerdfeger
• [Election-Methods] Measuring power in a multi winner election   Juho
• [Election-Methods] How important is the Schwartz criterion? Also, what is the Landau set, and how is different from the   John Wong
• [Election-Methods] How important is the Schwartz criterion? Also, what is the Landau set, and how is different from the   Chris Benham
• [Election-Methods] How important is the Schwartz criterion? Also, what is the Landau set, and ho   John Wong
• [Election-Methods] Larry Diamond coming to Georgetown Univ. Oct 25   Jack Santucci
• [Election-Methods] How important is the Schwartz criterion? Also, what is the Landau set, and ho   John Wong
• [Election-Methods] How important is the Schwartz criterion? Also, what is the Landau set, and ho   John Wong
• [Election-Methods] Fwd: Measuring power in a multi winner election   Juho
• [Election-Methods] How important is the Schwartz criterion? Also, what is the Landau set, and ho   Juho Laatu
• [Election-Methods] Landau and Schwartz set   John Wong
• [Election-Methods] Measuring power in a multi winner election   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] Fwd: Measuring power in a multi winner election   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] RE : Measuring power in a multi winner election   Kevin Venzke
• [Election-Methods] RE : Landau and Schwartz set   Kevin Venzke
• [Election-Methods] Landau and Schwartz set   Rob LeGrand
• [Election-Methods] "Strong Minimal Defense"//FPP (Whole), a new 3-slot FBC method   Chris Benham
• [Election-Methods] Landau and Schwartz set   John Wong
• [Election-Methods] IRV/Approval/Range comparisons on Wikipedia   Michael Rouse
• [Election-Methods] IRV/Approval/Range comparisons on Wikipedia   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] IRV/Approval/Range comparisons on Wikipedia   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: Landau and Schwartz set   Kevin Venzke
• [Election-Methods] Landau and Schwartz set   Rob LeGrand
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: Landau and Schwartz set   Kevin Venzke
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: IRV/Approval/Range comparisons on Wikipedia   Kevin Venzke
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: IRV/Approval/Range comparisons on Wikipedia   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] RE : Measuring power in a multi winner election   Howard Swerdfeger
• [Election-Methods] Measuring power in a multi winner election   Howard Swerdfeger
• [Election-Methods] Measuring power in a multi winner election   Howard Swerdfeger
• [Election-Methods] Landau and Schwartz set   Rob LeGrand
• [Election-Methods] How is the Nanson and/or Baldwin non-monotonic?   John Wong
• [Election-Methods] Measuring power in a multi winner election   Juho
• [Election-Methods] IRV/Approval/Range comparisons on Wikipedia   Warren Smith
• [Election-Methods] Measuring power in a multi winner election   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] IRV/Approval/Range comparisons on Wikipedia   Andrew Myers
• [Election-Methods] Hey Election ;)   Doreen Ellen
• [Election-Methods] Hey Election ;)   Doreen Ellen
• [Election-Methods] SPAM Re: Hey Election ;)   Augustin
• [Election-Methods] peer-reviewed work that is critical of IRV   Kevin Venzke
• [Election-Methods] peer-reviewed work that is critical of IRV   Howard Swerdfeger
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: peer-reviewed work that is critical of IRV   Kevin Venzke
• [Election-Methods] peer-reviewed work that is critical of IRV   James Gilmour
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: peer-reviewed work that is critical of IRV   Kevin Venzke
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: peer-reviewed work that is critical ofIRV   James Gilmour
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: peer-reviewed work that is critical of IRV   Dave Ketchum
• [Election-Methods] RE : Is "sincere" voting in Range suboptimal?   Dave Ketchum
• [Election-Methods] peer-reviewed work that is critical of IRV   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: peer-reviewed work that is critical of IRV   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: peer-reviewed work that is critical of IRV   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: peer-reviewed work that is critical ofIRV   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: RE : Re: peer-reviewed work that is critical of IRV   Kevin Venzke
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: peer-reviewed work that is critical of IRV   Jan Kok
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: RE : Re: peer-reviewed work that iscritical of IRV   James Gilmour
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: peer-reviewed work that is critical ofIRV   James Gilmour
• [Election-Methods] RE : Re: peer-reviewed work that is critical ofIRV   Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

Last message date: Sat Sep 29 16:57:39 PDT 2007
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:33:19 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...