[Election-Methods] elect the compromise
Jobst Heitzig
heitzig-j at web.de
Sun Sep 2 23:03:42 PDT 2007
Dear Forest,
> Perhaps candidates should be required to publish their range ballots
> before the election, and their "trading" of assets should be required
> to be "rational" relative to these announced ratings?
>
I had this idea, too. But upon closer inspection, it is not quite easy
to define what in this case "rational" means, since in this form of
trading there easily arise situations similar to the prisoner's dilemma
and situations in which "bluffing" could work...
Yours, Jobst
> Or perhaps, a randomly chose jury of candidate X supporters should have
> some say in the candidate X proxy decisions?
>
> Forest
>
>
>
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
>
>
>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list