[Election-Methods] How is the Nanson and/or Baldwin non-monotonic?
John Wong
johnwong00 at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 24 22:31:22 PDT 2007
This is a great example, but how do I knoew where to add four?
> Subject: Re: [Election-Methods] How is the Nanson and/or Baldwin non-monotonic?
> From: jjfaran at blaschke.math.buffalo.edu
> To: johnwong00 at hotmail.com
> CC: election-methods at electorama.com
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:56:09 -0400
>
> OK, here's a description on how to generate a Nanson example. A similar
> method should generate a Baldwin example.
>
> Start with a profile that gives the Borda ranking A>B>C:
>
> ABC: 2
> BAC: 1
>
> This gives Borda scores A:5, B:4, C:0, and A beats B pairwise, so A is
> the Nanson winner. We want to have enough voters to move (increasing
> ranking of A) without changing the ranking of C so that, after the move,
> C then has a better Borda score than B. This requires 5 voters of type
> either CBA or BAC. Adding 5 voters of each type doesn't change the
> ranking, so take the profile
>
> ABC: 7
> ACB: 5
> CAB: 5
> CBA: 5
> BCA: 5
> BAC: 6
>
> Borda: A 35, B 34, C 30. A still wins Nanson, but if we switch,
> increasing A's rankings (5 CBA voters become 5 CAB voters),
>
> ABC: 7
> ACB: 5
> CAB: 10
> CBA: 0
> BCA: 5
> BAC: 6
>
> Borda: A 40, B 29, C 30. B is now eliminated, but A beats C pairwise, so
> A is still the Nanson winner. We need to make C beat A pairwise without
> messing up the Borda rankings, so we add Condorcet triplets of the
> correct type. A is beating C by 3, so we need to add 4.
>
> Original Profile:
> ABC: 11
> ACB: 5
> CAB: 9
> CBA: 5
> BCA: 9
> BAC: 6
>
> Borda: A 47, B 46, C 42. C is eliminated and A beats B pairwise 25-20.
>
> New Profile (5 CBA voters become 5 CAB voters):
> ABC: 11
> ACB: 5
> CAB: 14
> CBA: 0
> BCA: 9
> BAC: 6
>
> Borda: A 52, B 41, C 42. B is eliminated and C beats A 23-22.
>
> We could also take 5 BAC voters and make them ABC voters and get another
> example.
>
> You should be able to find a Baldwin example by a similar technique.
>
>
> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 00:55 -0700, John Wong wrote:
> > How is the Nanson and/or Baldwin non-monotonic? I've been trying to develop
> > an example where they are non-monotonic, but I'm having trouble.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Share your special parenting moments!
> > http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us
> >
> > ----
> > Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
> --
> James J Faran <jjfaran at blaschke.math.buffalo.edu>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Capture your memories in an online journal!
http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20070924/228355e7/attachment-0003.htm>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list