April 1996 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Apr 1 23:55:46 PST 1996
Ending: Tue Apr 30 03:49:12 PDT 1996
Messages: 141

• Reply on EM to Mike's Reply on ER   Bruce Anderson
• Reply on EM to Mike's Reply on ER   Bruce Anderson
• Reply on EM to Mike's Reply on ER   Bruce Anderson
• Arithmetic Errors   Bruce Anderson
• Bruce's part 2 reply to Steve   Bruce Anderson
• Definition of "Pairwise Method"   Bruce Anderson
• Calculating the Smith set?   Bruce Anderson
• Definition of "Pairwise Method"   Bruce Anderson
• Calculating the Smith set?   Bruce Anderson
• Definition of "Pairwise Method"   Bruce Anderson
• Definition of "Pairwise Method"   Bruce Anderson
• Calculating the Smith set?   Bruce Anderson
• Definition of "Pairwise Method"   Bruce Anderson
• Calc. Smith set   Bruce Anderson
• Definition of Condorcet's method   Bruce Anderson
• Definition of Pairwise Method   Bruce Anderson
• Definition of Condorcet's method   Bruce Anderson
• York's version of Nanson's method   Bruce Anderson
• "New" method: weighted ballots tallied pairwise   Steve Eppley
• [EM] (Fwd) STV and truncation   Steve Eppley
• [EM] (Fwd) STV and truncation   Steve Eppley
• Reply on EM to Mike's Reply on ER   Steve Eppley
• (Fwd) Condorcet counter-example (fwd)   Steve Eppley
• Generalized Majority Rule (was Re: Bruce, Condorcet & Copeland)   Steve Eppley
• Will the real Condorcet please stand up? (was RE: Re: Reply on E   Steve Eppley
• Complexity of Condorcet (was Re: Reply on EM to Mike's Reply on   Steve Eppley
• [EM] (Fwd) STV and truncation   Steve Eppley
• Definition of pairwise (was Re: Reply on EM to Mike's...)   Steve Eppley
• Condorcet misinterpretation (was Re: Arithmetic Errors)   Steve Eppley
• Standards vs. Criteria (was Re: Reply on EM to Mike's Re   Steve Eppley
• Calculating the Smith set?   Steve Eppley
• Calculating the Smith set?   Steve Eppley
• Definition of "Pairwise Method"   Steve Eppley
• Calculating the Smith set?   Steve Eppley
• Calculating the Smith set?   Steve Eppley
• Fairness, votes against, and Condorcet(x)   Steve Eppley
• Why it saves time [calc'ing Smith]   Steve Eppley
• more on fairness & votes-against   Steve Eppley
• Calculating the Smith set?   Steve Eppley
• Fairness, votes against, and Condorcet(x)   Steve Eppley
• Elimination by largest votes-against? (was Re: Fairness,   Steve Eppley
• SWC's original task   Steve Eppley
• Calc. Smith set   Steve Eppley
• Direction of this list   Steve Eppley
• Definition of Condorcet's method   Steve Eppley
• New SW method: Weighting with elimination & renormalization   Steve Eppley
• Calculating the Smith set: an optimization   Steve Eppley
• Direction of this list   Steve Eppley
• New SW method: Weighting with elimination etc.   Steve Eppley
• Nondictatorial & Nonmanipulable axioms (was Re: York's version o   Steve Eppley
• [EM] (Fwd) STV and truncation   Kevin Hornbuckle
• [EM] (Fwd) STV and truncation   Kevin Hornbuckle
• motion   Kevin Hornbuckle
• Recommendations   Kevin Hornbuckle
• Condorcet computer count   Rob Lanphier
• Sorry for the chaos   Rob Lanphier
• mail woes (fwd)   Rob Lanphier
• files sent to lists (fwd)   Rob Lanphier
• on a lighter note... (fwd)   Rob Lanphier
• Direction of this list   Rob Lanphier
• Calculating the Smith set?   Rob Lanphier
• catmail problems (fwd)   Rob Lanphier
• Direction of this list   Rob Lanphier
• Elections: Single-Winner Methods   Rob Lanphier
• EM Chaos   Rob Lanphier
• Bruce, Condorcet & Copeland   Mike Ossipoff
• (Fwd) Condorcet counter-example (fwd)   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] (Fwd) STV and truncation   Mike Ossipoff
• STV truncation example   Mike Ossipoff
• STV truncation. SW vs PR as issues for EM   Mike Ossipoff
• Reply on EM to Mike's Reply on ER   Mike Ossipoff
• My public Smith//Condorcet definition   Mike Ossipoff
• [EM] (Fwd) STV and truncation   Mike Ossipoff
• Generalized Majority Rule (was Re: Bruce, Condorcet & Copeland)   Mike Ossipoff
• B wins in Bruce's 2 examples.   Mike Ossipoff
• Bruce's part 2 reply to Steve   Mike Ossipoff
• Standards, Criteria, Formulese   Mike Ossipoff
• Condorcet computer count   Mike Ossipoff
• Explaining Condorcet for Single Winner Elections   Mike Ossipoff
• Arithmetic Errors   Mike Ossipoff
• Dictionary Delaying-Tactic   Mike Ossipoff
• Standards vs. Criteria (was Re: Reply on EM to Mike's Re   Mike Ossipoff
• Calculating the Smith set?   Mike Ossipoff
• Definition of "Pairwise Method"   Mike Ossipoff
• replying to Demorep, 4/14/96   Mike Ossipoff
• Condorcet Math in all Elections   Mike Ossipoff
• precision improvement   Mike Ossipoff
• Academic Criteria & Condorcet's Method   Mike Ossipoff
• Smith, MM, & Condorcet   Mike Ossipoff
• Majority Loser Criterion & Condorcet   Mike Ossipoff
• Copeland's candidate-counting & consequences (fwd)   Mike Ossipoff
• Definition of "Pairwise Method"   Mike Ossipoff
• Definition of "Pairwise Method"   Mike Ossipoff
• Replying to Bruce on Definitions   Mike Ossipoff
• Bruce's Condorcet definition   Mike Ossipoff
• Definition of "Pairwise Method"   Mike Ossipoff
• Smith procedure briefly stated   Mike Ossipoff
• Calculating the Smith set?   Mike Ossipoff
• Brief initial reply to Steve   Mike Ossipoff
• Calculating the Smith set?   Mike Ossipoff
• Smith wording improvement   Mike Ossipoff
• Why it saves time   Mike Ossipoff
• SWC's original task   Mike Ossipoff
• Fairness, votes against, and Condorcet(x)   Mike Ossipoff
• Calc. Smith set   Mike Ossipoff
• Definition of Pairwise (to Bruce)   Mike Ossipoff
• Definition of Condorcet's method   Mike Ossipoff
• Procedural Motions   Mike Ossipoff
• more on fairness & votes-against   Mike Ossipoff
• SWC's original task   Mike Ossipoff
• Countng Disapprovals   Mike Ossipoff
• My New Ballot (standards)   Mike Ossipoff
• G.M.C. not a standard   Mike Ossipoff
• Doubts re: 2-approval requirement   Mike Ossipoff
• more on fairness & votes-against   Mike Ossipoff
• Fairness, votes against, and Condorcet(x)   Mike Ossipoff
• Mike's Motions   Mike Ossipoff
• New SW method: Weighting with elimination & renormalization   Mike Ossipoff
• York's version of Nanson's method   Mike Ossipoff
• 2 Corrections   Mike Ossipoff
• Why it saves time   Mike Ossipoff
• New SW method: Weighting with elimination etc.   Mike Ossipoff
• Condorcet computer count   Lucien Saumur
• Condorcet computer count   Ed Still
• [EM] (Fwd) Problem with Condorcet?   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Variables/Condorcet Factorial math   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Reply on EM to Mike's Reply on ER   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Explaining Condorcet for Single Winner Elections   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Arithmetic Errors   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Which Condorcet tie breaker   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Oregon Constitution, Art. II, Sec. 16   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Higher Majority Winner   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Condorcet Math in all Elections   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Transferring Votes in Condorcet   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Arrays   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• New SW method: Weighting with elimination etc.   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Approval Voting Major Defect   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Why it saves time   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Fairness, votes against, and Condorcet(x)   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Elections: Single-Winner Methods   DEMOREP1 at aol.com
• Republican primaries reform   DEMOREP1 at aol.com

Last message date: Tue Apr 30 03:49:12 PDT 1996
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:29:26 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...