February 2011 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Feb 1 18:27:34 PST 2011
Ending: Mon Feb 28 10:15:13 PST 2011
Messages: 111

• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   Bob Crossley
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   Bob Crossley
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Charlie DeTar
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Charlie DeTar
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Padraig Delgado
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   Kathy Dopp
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Raph Frank
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   Raph Frank
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   Raph Frank
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   James Gilmour
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   James Gilmour
• [EM] eliminate the plurality loser until there is a Condorcet winner   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Mutual majority set methods   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] immunity to burying   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] immunity to burying   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] immunity to burying   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] immunity to burying   James Green-Armytage
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Andy Jennings
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Andy Jennings
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Dave Ketchum
• [EM] mutual majority set   Paul Kislanko
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Juho Laatu
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] strategy and information   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why care about... let's play a game   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Why care about... let's play a game   Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Mutual majority set methods   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Mutual majority set methods   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] mutual majority set   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] mutual majority set   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] More mutual majority set results.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] More mutual majority set results.   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] new working paper: (edit/second thought)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] immunity to burying   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] new working paper: (edit/second thought)   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Trying to out-do... a result! pt 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] CFC-Young, a more time-complexity friendly clustering multiwinner method   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Trying to out-do... a result! pt 2   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] ASCII maps showing methods' "distances"   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] ASCII maps   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] WSJ article about AMPAS voting   Brian Olson
• [EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] immunity to burying   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] immunity to burying   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] earlier-no-harm/help, edit again, MCA   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] immunity to burying   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] ASCII maps showing methods' "distances"   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Bucklin variant, and in general   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Truncation-resistant MCA method: MCA-Asset   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Truncation-resistant MCA method: MCA-Asset   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Truncation-resistant MCA method: MCA-Asset   Jameson Quinn
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Michael Rouse
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Markus Schulze
• [EM] Mutual majority set methods   Leon Smith
• [EM] mutual majority set   Warren Smith
• [EM] mutual majority set   Warren Smith
• [EM] mutual majority set   Warren Smith
• [EM] Borda-Condorcet relation again   Stephen Turner
• [EM] eliminate the plurality loser until there is a Condorcet winner   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] mutual majority set   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] mutual majority set   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] new working paper: "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections"   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] new working paper: (edit/second thought)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] new working paper: (edit/second thought)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] earlier-no-harm/help   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] earlier-no-harm/help, edit again, MCA   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] new working paper: (edit/second thought)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Trying to out-do Condorcet//IRV (via method generator)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Trying to out-do... a result!   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Trying to out-do... a result! pt 2   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Trying to out-do... a result! pt 2   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] ASCII maps showing methods' "distances"   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why care about later-no-harm or prohibiting candidate burial?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Trying to out-do... a result! pt 2   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Bucklin variant, and in general   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] ASCII maps   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why care about... let's play a game   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why care about... let's play a game   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Scenarios defining the method space   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] ASCII maps   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Some numbers (LNHs, compromise/withdrawal, burial games)   Kevin Venzke
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Brandon Wiley
• [EM] electing a variable number of seats   Brandon Wiley
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] dunno if you're interested...   robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Why is wikipedia so biased pro-IRV?   ⸘Ŭalabio‽

Last message date: Mon Feb 28 10:15:13 PST 2011
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:35:01 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...