[EM] Trying to out-do... a result! pt 2

[Kristofer Munsterhjelm]

Kevin Venzke wrote:

> Now, if only we could use something more clone-friendly than first
> preferences... The tricky thing is that most other metrics (such as
> worst pairwise loss) are already vulnerable to burial.

It would be a very strange system, but perhaps IRV. Define the ordering 
so that if X is eliminated before Y, Y is ranked ahead of X. IRV itself 
is cloneproof, which Plurality isn't, so the result should at least be 
more clone-friendly.

I'm not sure, but I have the feeling that the Plurality variant would 
not be monotone. The IRV variant wouldn't be, either.